Well nothing fancy - just 3 multiples to make things easier. And
I´ve added a spring reverb - old standalone box - matches the tolex
of the dotcom spot on. The dotcom is awsome - but not the modulation
freak that the doepfer was. But I realised that I was more into
Wendy Carlos/Larry Fast kind of music than Morton Subotnick :o)

How about posting a picture of your machine - I´d like to see what
has become of "my baby".

Keld


--- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com , "Silas Johansen" <sijodk@...>
wrote:

>
> Hi Keld,
>
> I noticed that, which is why I specified using a harmonics-rich
> waveform to feed the filter. Dollismine also asked about a patch
> without a filter so no reason to include one until he got that to

work

> as it would only have complicated matters further.
>
> I'm still happy with your old A-100 - it's the centerpiece of my
> "studio" and I play it almost daily. I've added a sequencer, an
> envelope follower and a CV mixer to sort of customize it to my

needs.

> It'll probably grow at the rate of a few modules a year over the

next

> few years, perhaps for longer. The MCV4 died on me and has been
> replaced by a dotcom Q-104 and I'm considering getting a few more
> dotcom modules as well, now that I already got a PSU and power

control

> and interface modules.
>
> I've also rearranged thee modules quite a bit - I'm at three and a
> half rows right now, and I've tried to arrange them so

the "standard"

> signal flow is top to bottom instead of left to right. Sequencer

and a

> few other CV-sources on the top row, VCO's and some other stuff on

the

> next, then audio mixer, filters, signal processor and some others,

and

> the bottom row is mostly VCA's and EG's. I'm probably going to
> rearrange them again soon, but it's moving to a new and bigger rack
> once I find a way to get that one home so I'll wait until that is
> done.
>
> How's your dotcom doing I noticed on the dotcom mailing list that
> you've also extended that one a bit.
>
> Cheers,
> Silas
>
> On Jan 13, 2008 9:45 PM, Keld Sørensen <keldsorensen@...> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Hi Silas.
> >
> > The only reason for not mentioning the filter in my patch - was

that

> > dolsimine used a sine wave - no need for a filter as that

waveform

> > has no overtones to be filtered : o)
> >
> > P.S - you bougth my system - still having fun ....
> > Keld
> >
>