Hi Keld,

I noticed that, which is why I specified using a harmonics-rich
waveform to feed the filter. Dollismine also asked about a patch
without a filter so no reason to include one until he got that to work
as it would only have complicated matters further.

I'm still happy with your old A-100 - it's the centerpiece of my
"studio" and I play it almost daily. I've added a sequencer, an
envelope follower and a CV mixer to sort of customize it to my needs.
It'll probably grow at the rate of a few modules a year over the next
few years, perhaps for longer. The MCV4 died on me and has been
replaced by a dotcom Q-104 and I'm considering getting a few more
dotcom modules as well, now that I already got a PSU and power control
and interface modules.

I've also rearranged thee modules quite a bit - I'm at three and a
half rows right now, and I've tried to arrange them so the "standard"
signal flow is top to bottom instead of left to right. Sequencer and a
few other CV-sources on the top row, VCO's and some other stuff on the
next, then audio mixer, filters, signal processor and some others, and
the bottom row is mostly VCA's and EG's. I'm probably going to
rearrange them again soon, but it's moving to a new and bigger rack
once I find a way to get that one home so I'll wait until that is
done.

How's your dotcom doing I noticed on the dotcom mailing list that
you've also extended that one a bit.

Cheers,
Silas

On Jan 13, 2008 9:45 PM, Keld Sørensen < keldsorensen@... > wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Hi Silas.
>
> The only reason for not mentioning the filter in my patch - was that
> dolsimine used a sine wave - no need for a filter as that waveform
> has no overtones to be filtered : o)
>
> P.S - you bougth my system - still having fun ....
> Keld
>