Excuse my name here it is of course Achtung_999 posting here a.k.a. Ernst
Sorry for that... crazy Gmail...

On 9/24/05, *--* < heinrich.himmelwasser@... > wrote:
>
> Hello Dieter,
>
> The patches you describe here are both close to the unit I tried to
> decribe (thanks for that!!).
> However the lower voltage as an offset is a misunderstanding.
> For as far as I remember it was so with the TMG at sonology that if you
> put the lower and upper voltages
> on the same level that it would only output that voltage. In both your
> patches it also generates output below..
> Maybe I'm wrong.. But I will defianately start investigating.
> And also I would still be interested in a modulel ike this, saves a lot of
> patchcords and modules I can use in the rest of the patch. ;-)
> Anyway I will get back on this later this week after I have contacted my
> sources at Sonology.
>
> Friendly greetings,
>
> Ernst
>
> On 9/21/05, Dieter Doepfer < hardware@... > wrote:
> >
> > From my understanding this can realized with an A-149-1, VCA ( e.g.
> > A-132)
> > and mixer (e.g. A-138a). The clock is the A-149-1 clock, lower CV goes
> > to
> > one A-138a input (kind of mixer offset), the A-149-1 output is processes
> > by
> > a VCA with VCA CV as upper CV, the VCA output goes to another mixer
> > input.
> > The mixer output is the Tendency mask generator output. The A-149-1
> > could
> > also be replaced by an random module A-118 and a S&H A-148. In this case
> > the
> > clock goes to the A-148 clock input.
> >
> > I don't think that it justifies a new module even though it would be no
> > problem for us.
> >
> > Best wishes
> > Dieter Doepfer
> >
> >
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]