So why don't you run a +5 and the original signal through a linear
138 That should do the trick, though it wouldn't save much space or
money I suppose..... But then again, mixers are always usefull.

--- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com , "code_pig" <code_pig@y...> wrote:
> Actually, I just wanted a dual offset module because I really don't
> need (or have room for) and A129/3.
>
> I mean, I don't want to whine, but I really don't think it should
be
> necessary for one to purchase the A129/3 (which really can't be
fully
> expolited without the A129/4 Controller) when all one may need is a
> couple of offset generators.
>
> Regards,
> Kevin
>
> --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com , "jmaddocks1975"
> <jmaddocks1975@y...> wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I agree, this is something I am looking at building.
> > My a129 never gets used and I really want a fixed filter, so if I
> can
> > make a module with 15 pots to control the a129/2 I got one.
> > Any ideas of best way to make it
> >
> > John
> > --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com , "pstnotpd" <psm@w...> wrote:
> > > Wouldn't that be fairly easy to make yourself A number of pots
> 15
> > > running from the internal power. Something like a CV source+ so
> > that
> > > the 129 could be used as a filter bank, but much cheaper an
space
> > > consuming.
> > > Or am I getting you wrong
> > >
> > >
> > > --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com , "code_pig" <code_pig@y...>
> > wrote:
> > > > This might have already been discussed, but...
> > > >
> > > > I know the A129/3 does offsets, but might there be room for
> > > something
> > > > like a simple dual offset generator module
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Kevin