> think the 162 may not be needed (not totally sure )

Ooops! Had more of think about this, and realised I was confusing the
148 with the freeze/follow of the 129/5...

- without it (if

> it works!) the 148 will hold the same CV until the next time the

198

> is touched, and as long as there is _some_ attack on the EG
> controlling the VCA, hopefully the 148 will have let go of the old
> note and be 'following' again before you hear anything...).

... but since the 148 just samples when triggered, and then holds,
the patch needs modifying so that the held 148 signal is replaced
with the new, varying CV_pos from the 198 next time it is
touched/gated... (someone help me out here, feels like I'm digging
myself into a hole...!)

Tim