so, Dieter, i guess its time to start planning one then...    ;-)



Bakis Sirros - Parallel Worlds / Interconnected / Memory Geist

1 group owner

www. parallel - worlds - music. com

www. facebook. com/ pages/Parallel-Worlds/192093934136476

www. myspace. com/ parallelworldsmusic

www. myspace. com/ interconnectedmusic

www. myspace. com/ memorygeist

www. DiN. org. uk

www. musicamaximamagnetica. com

www. vu-us. com

--- On Mon, 8/1/11, yahoo@... < yahoo@... > wrote:

From: yahoo@... < yahoo@... >
Subject: AW: AW: AW: 1 Shift Register
To: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com
Date: Monday, August 1, 2011, 3:17 PM







 









> Dieter,

>

> say we have 4 vcos and a 4-stage ASR. We feed the VCOs a melody

> like A-C-D-E

>

> On the A-152, we would see (A 0 0 0) (A C 0 0) (A C D 0) (A C D E) etc

> On an ASR, we would see (A 0 0 0) (C A 0 0) (D C A 0) (E D C A)

> (A E D C) etc

>

> You are right in that after one cycle, we will have the 4

> voltages available simultaneously. BUT you are wrong in assuming

> that the VCOs will all be the same. Imagine 4 mono synths with

> completely different sounds. On the A-152, each synth will *stay

> on the same note* in this example. On the ASR, each synth will be

> playing the melody, but delayed by one step. Big difference.

>

> Or lets say we have a 3-step melody, A-C-D, running into the same setup.

>

> A-152: (A 0 0 0) (A C 0 0) (A C D 0) (A C D A) (C C D A) (C D D

> A) (C D A A) etc

> ASR: (A 0 0 0) (C A 0 0) (D C A 0) (A D C A) (C A D C) (D C A D) etc

>

>

> I hope this clears it up a bit.

>

> Denis



Hello Denis,



if you think about complete voices with different settings the difference is

obvious. I took only the VCOs into consideration.



Thank you

Dieter






















[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]