Yeah, like, for example, the Oberheim Systemizer, now that I think of it.

-----Original Message-----
From: oberheim@yahoogroups.com [mailto: oberheim@yahoogroups.com ] On Behalf
Of Fraser Hutchinson
Sent: Friday, April 16, 2010 1:07 PM
To: oberheim@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [oberheim] Re: Help me with a Matrix 1000 vs. 6R decision...



You could do that with almost any midi event processor, I believe.



From: oberheim@yahoogroups.com [mailto: oberheim@yahoogroups.com ] On Behalf
Of LarryS
Sent: Friday, April 16, 2010 11:37 AM
To: oberheim@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [oberheim] Re: Help me with a Matrix 1000 vs. 6R decision...





Stereo is cool, yes.



But the only thing I *wish* I could come up with is an even/odd note
assignment.



Yamaha did this on the TX802 (and maybe a couple other modules). You could
assign the module to respond to all the even number notes or odd numbered
notes. This is a fabulous function.



Unless you play in a lot of diminished or whole tone scales, anyway ;-)



It interleaves the notes very nicely. It's the ONLY reason I keep a couple
of Yam modules around and I so wish I could do it with the Oberheims.



Kurzweil does this, too, by any divisor by assigning multiple modules (1of3,
2of3, 3of3, for instance).



Number tricks.



Anyway, the effect is incredible in my books. Like to do it with my M1000s.



L.







From: oberheim@yahoogroups.com [mailto: oberheim@yahoogroups.com ] On Behalf
Of Paul Cunningham
Sent: Friday, April 16, 2010 11:19 AM
To: oberheim@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [oberheim] Re: Help me with a Matrix 1000 vs. 6R decision...





Yeah... I mean I've got 3 Matrix-1000s now and there is a subtle difference
between the sound of each of them! That's part of the reason they sound so
good in stereo! -pc