I uploaded the factory patches for the matrix-1000. These match the pdf list here in the files section except for patch-199 which lists "samplthis" and I could not find that patch in my libraries.
These sysex files will switch to the proper banks (0 or 1) and then load the files. I deleted the old sysex file which was incomplete...

I used Midi-Ox to load these through a USB midisport 1x1 with buffer sizes of 512 bytes and delays of 100ms. All of them loaded and played fine using a Remote 25LE midi key controller. When the touchpad sends aftertouch too quickly the M1k loses touch with the data and the aftertouch level locks until things calm down. Typical....
Fran

--- In oberheim@yahoogroups.com , Martin Ator <cyllall@...> wrote:
>
> Ahh. I see it now.
>
> H means Hex Ignore the H and you get
> F0 10 06 1A F7 .
> 1A is the Bank change at the end. and then nothing, because there is nothing.
> So if there are patches 100-199, then they are somewhere else in the ether.
> Thanks all.
> Peace.
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: wolzow <margus.kliimask@...>
> To: oberheim@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Fri, 21 January, 2011 22:53:57
> Subject: Re: [oberheim] Re: Matrix-1000 Original RAM sysex
>
>
> hi,
>
> the file in Files section (Matrix 1000 Original RAM Presets 0-199.syx) contains:
> 1) sysex command to select bank 0
> 2) 100 sysex commands to upload patches 0..99, that become patches 000..099 in
> M-100
> 3) sysex command to select bank 1
> 4) 1 sysex command to upload patch 0, that becomes patch 100 in M-100.
>
> that's it. you get 101 patches, not 200. so it's quite close to, but not EXACTLY
> what the name implies :)
>
>
>
> On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 12:41 AM, Paul Cunningham <paul@...> wrote:
>
>
> >also true... it could be overflowing the midi in buffer on the matrix-1000 which
> >is easy to do even with a series of patch change commands. make sure what you
> >are using to send the midi data with has an open for slower transmission.
> >
> >
> >does anyone else know about that file in this group -pc
> >
> >
> >On Jan 21, 2011, at 5:36 PM, Paul Cunningham <paul@...> wrote:
> >
> >> BTW, there's a note: "A gap of at least ten msec should be allowed between
> >>patches when sending
> >> multiple patches to the M-1000."
> >
>