Hi Anton

>>you snaffle my suggestions ;-))
> Quite honestly, I don't see how our approaches could be more
> different.

Sorry, Anton, it should be kidding. I never intended to embarrasse you.

I also never wanted to say that your intention of creating a groove is
the same like mine. I only wanted to describe, what I could imagine.

>>I think, this can be done with several A155 plus A142 (and maybe other
>>modules) already If you use the A155, you can use one row for creating
>>CVs for the Clock-VCO, which work similar like the described DIN-Sync
>>shuffling.
> I bet you a crate of dutch beer it won't be the same :-))

You are right: of course it is not the same.

The main problem is, that the Seq-outCV-controls-VCO method influences
the tempo. This should not happen to my opinion.

> The typical delay-range for the individual steps would be somewhere
> between +/- 5 and 200 ms, so in this aspect this idea would require
> more precision than the A-162, which has a (+/- ) trigger delay of
> up to 10 seconds, and which is not very precise in the 15 - 50 ms
> range, where a lot of groove is to be found.

It is technically very simple to add an switch and an alternative
capacitor to reduce the delay time range. Like the range switches of the
A140 envelopes.



Regards, Florian


PS:

> I bet you a crate of dutch beer

Never, never, never bet for dutch beer with someone born and living in
Bavaria. ;-)