Or 188-1 for 1024 stages and the further one 188-2 for 2048!
all the best
Axel

"Bakis Sirros" < synth_freak_2000@... > schrieb:

> hello,
> yes, dieter, i would prefer the single module too.
> maybe you could label one as A188-1a and the other
> A188-1b to avoid confusion.
> bakis.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --- ilanode < techmeier@... > wrote:
>
> > For a guitar stomp box a switch to change eg btn
> > chorus and flanger
> > is a good and common idea. For a modular synth an
> > independent delay
> > which can be combined with another independent one
> > makes much more
> > sense. Regards, Ingo
> > --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com , "Dieter
> > Doepfer"
> > <hardware@d...> wrote:
> > >
> > > The preliminary information of the BBD module has
> > been updated. I
> > think that
> > > the main features of the module are defined in the
> > meantime. But
> > there is
> > > one thing that leaded to internal discussions in
> > the company and
> > I'd like to
> > > hear your comments:
> > >
> > > Should we manufacture a single module similar to
> > the prototype
> > shown on the
> > > page with 2048 or 1024 stages BBD (can be chosen
> > by the customer
> > in his
> > > order). The pc board will be designed for both
> > types which are
> > unfortunately
> > > not compatible.
> > >
> > > Or do you prefer a double module with both BBDs on
> > the module. Both
> > > solutions have advantages and disadvantages. The
> > main advantage of
> > the
> > > single module is the lower price. But one would
> > need two of these
> > modules to
> > > have both time ranges available (down to 7ms or
> > 2,5ms resp.). The
> > advantage
> > > of the dual module would be the lower price if
> > both time ranges
> > are required
> > > simultaneously (compared to two single modules),
> > and the mixing
> > > possibilities of both BBD sections. But the lower
> > price is
> > attainable only
> > > if the module contains only one HSVCO for both
> > BBDs. Otherwise the
> > price of
> > > the double module will be nearly the same as for
> > two single
> > modules.
> > >
> > > I'd prefer the single version (though I voted for
> > the double
> > version in the
> > > past ...).
> > >
> > > I can't wait to see your comments. Bakis, maybe
> > you could start a
> > poll (very
> > > simple: single or double module prefered).
> > >
> > > Best wishes
> > > Dieter Doepfer
> > >
> > >
> > > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> > > > Von: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com
> > > > [mailto: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com ]Im Auftrag
> > von Florian
> > Anwander
> > > > Gesendet: Dienstag, 22. November 2005 14:51
> > > > An: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com
> > > > Betreff: Re: AW: 1 Re: ring
> > modulators - new
> > examples
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Hi Dieter and Ingo
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > >>I think I'll get the tools out of the box,
> > Peter's mod sounds
> > niceeee!
> > > > >>I was quite surprised about the A133 example,
> > very cool that
> > it sounds
> > > > >>so similar to the A114.
> > > > > Even I'm very surprised as completely
> > different circuits are
> > > > used. The A-114
> > > > > uses the balanced modulator MC1496 (normally
> > for high frequency
> > > > > applications), the A-133 a LM13700 Dual OTA
> > design.
> > > > I think this is valid only for the very simple
> > sources of the
> > first
> > > > example. Also a resonating VCF crossmodulated by
> > a sine VCO
> > won't sound
> > > > much different.
> > > > The example with the TR-808 and the continuous
> > sound from the
> > korg shows
> > > > clearly the difference between the 114 and the
> > 133.
> > > >
> > > > Florian
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> Bakis Sirros
> Parallel Worlds
> Athens-Greece
> 1 group owner
> http://www.shimarecords.co.uk
> http://www.rubber.gr
>
>
>
> __________________________________
> Yahoo! FareChase: Search multiple travel sites in one click.
> http://farechase.yahoo.com
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>