--- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com , "ilanode" <techmeier@w...> wrote:

>
> --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com , "selfoscillate"
> <synaptic_music@y...> wrote:
> >
> >
> > hello antonio,
> >
> > the missing lows in #5 are probably because the
> > cgs real ring is a passive device, the output
> > loudness is weak on this module.
>
> Just want to add that the RRM is known to load the VCOs and thus
> affecting their performance. The results would be different if the
> inputs of the RRM were buffered. One could add an Op Amp to each
> input or (if I'm not mistaken) 2 Analogue Solutions' MX224
> Mixer/Buffer Modules. Obviously the latter is not very economical.
> Regards, Ingo

i usually use those mx224 buffers in front of the cgs real ring,
but i didn't in my example, because i wanted to show the
significant differences of the loudness.
anyway, if you use those buffers, the output level of
the cgs real ring is still much lower than on the other
ring modulators.

best wishes

ingo