Hi Ingo,

thanks, great comparison

you should add a DSP style ring modulator too, just too see the
deviation from the "pure" mathematical creation (something like CSound
or MAX or the pick your flavour).

I must say the more dramatic is #3
And I don't understand the missing lows in the #5 (the mp3 compression )

thank you
at

--- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com , "selfoscillate"
<synaptic_music@y...> wrote:

>
>
> hello,
>
> yesterday i modded an a114 like suggested
> by peter and tim. when testing the device
> i compared it with other ringmodulators.
> here is a short recording to show the
> timbral differences and also the varying
> loudness.
>
> http://www.selfoscillate.de/a100files/ringmods-sequence.mp3
>
> file size: 429 kb
>
> all ring modulators use the same audio sources
> (sinewaves from two a111, each vco's pitch is
> controlled by it's own sequencer row).
>
> 1. a114 original
> 2. a114 tim's mod (c1 shorted)
> 3. a114 peter's mod (c2 shorted)
> 4. blacet klangwerk
> 5. cgs real ring modulator
>
>
> best wishes
>
> ingo
>