NO joe,
this group isn't about marketing for new modules.
this group is about EVERYTHING that has got to do with
the a100!!!(yes,i like the exclamation marks.)
it's just that at the present time doepfer is about to
release many new and(in my opinion)very interesting
modules so,i am just helping dieter doepfer to decide
what features to include,o.k.
so,some of you are DONE expanding your a100
systems,so,what others are just
starting,others,including me,have ONLY one modular
system(a100) and spend their money on expanding this
one system...
and doepfer's business model is NOT ONLY to expand his
modules range...
synthfreak


--- buechlerjoe < buechlerjoe@... > wrote:

> I think the difference in Philosophy is directly
> related to the issue
> of new gear versus existing gear. Doepfer's business
> model is to
> continuosly develop and sell new gear, and this
> forum primarily serves
> as a marketing focus group for that effort.
>
> Which is fine, that's what the description of the
> group on the main
> page says it is. I tend to ignore that aspect of the
> discussion, and
> use the forum to talk about music and patches when
> the opportunity
> comes up.
>
> I think a point that's being overlooked, though, is
> that lots of us
> are DONE expanding their A100 systems. That's why we
> don't have much
> interest in additional modules. Eventually, all of
> us reach a point
> where we have stopped expanding. If Doepfer is to
> have any hope of
> selling more stuff to this growing number of A100
> customers, it will
> have to be in the form of upgrades and improved
> versions of current
> modules and equipment.
>
> Joe
>
> It would be helpful --- In Doepfer_a100@y...,
> "Andreas Lindholm"
> <andreas.k.lindholm@t...>
> wrote:
> > No I don't think it is. It is just another set of
> those
> "unnessecary
> > features that you think should be there";-)
> >
> > I think you have been the most avid of the lot to
> keep things cheap
> and
> > stripped down. Now you ask for things to be
> included again. It just
> doesn't
> > make sense the way you and Florian on one hand
> think that crippled
> machines
> > should stay that way to make it cheap and the next
> second vote for
> umpteen
> > new features that are suddenly vital. It would be
> nice to hear about
> your
> > general philosophy regarding price vs. features. I
> hope it isn't
> just a
> > display of less self-centeredness. I try keep an
> open and modular
> mind i.e.
> > make things simple but offer possibilities of
> expansion so everybody
> can
> > decide for themselves what is vital and what is
> not rather than
> declaring
> > what people do need. I have met a few users of
> musictechnology and
> found
> > that not even users with the same gear work the
> same.
> >
> > Furthermore I find endless rows of exclamation
> marks a bit on the
> unserious
> > side, but perhaps that is just me. I just try to
> stick to standard
> > netiquette...
> >
> > /Andreas
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "bakis Sirros" <synth_freak_2000@y...>
> > To: <Doepfer_a100@y...>
> > Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 2:47 PM
> > Subject: Re: 1 A little about that
> touch keyboard
> >
> >
> > > ooooooo.......don't you understand that this
> sequencer
> > > NEEDS to be with the sensor keyboard the keys
> of the
> > > keyboard are used for activating steps/changing
> > > seq.lenght on the fly!!!so,it is nessessary to
> have a
> > > touch-sensor keyboard/sequencer!!!!!!!!!
> > > synthfreak
> > >
> > > --- davevosh@a... wrote:
> > > > In a message dated 2/26/2002 12:12:07 PM
> Eastern
> > > > Standard Time,
> > > > andreas.k.lindholm@t... writes:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > If the touch keyboard would amount to
> anything
> > > > good I would say that it
> > > > > should either exclude all sequencer
> functions or
> > > > they should be very
> > > > > carefully thought out. There is as far as I
> > > > understand it no point in adding
> > > > > something that if very limited when there
> are
> > > > several other solutions to do
> > > > > it better.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > hello !
> > > > i must agree here wholeheartedly ! better a
> > > > superior touch kybd / controller
> > > > than a mediocre sequencer. after the kybd is
> > > > completed, take a second look a
> > > > sequencing and envelope generation using
> something
> > > > still visionary, even
> > > > after all these years, like the old buchla
> multiple
> > > > arbitrary random function
> > > > generator as a conceptual starting point.
> > > > let each module "be what it is" and avoid
> "creeping
> > > > feature-itis" ..........
> > > > best,
> > > > dave
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been
> > > > removed]
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > =====
> > > synthfreak(parallel worlds)
> > > athens-greece
> > > 1 group owner-moderator
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email
> to:
> > > doepfer_a100-unsubscribe@y...
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> > >
> > >
>
>

=====
synthfreak(parallel worlds)
athens-greece
1 group owner-moderator

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!
Yahoo! Greetings - Send FREE e-cards for every occasion!
http://greetings.yahoo.com