Hi everyone,
I dont contribute all that often; I do make the time to read as much as I
can with regards to this group. The touch sensor keyboard should surely be
just that. No sequencer, simply a touch sensitive board. It is then up to
the individual to incorporate it as they see fit. The maq is cracking
sequencer, as is the a155, as I understand are AS and the like. Let doepfer
use the time to improve the ******werk sequencers. They have the potential
to be the most elaborate of all hardware/analogue style sequencers ever. My
main gripe with the schaltwerk is the inability to write patterns on the fly
longer than 16 notes. (Without pasting it over to a new pattern) Roland
managed it with the TR909 and that was some time ago and until the
schaltwerk is capable of achieving immediate writing of notes on a pattern
of greater than 16.
Regards
To all
Tris
-----Original Message-----
From:
david.salter@...
[mailto:
david.salter@...
]
Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 2:11 PM
To:
Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: 1 A little about that touch keyboard
I agree that if a sequencer is to be incorporated into the touch keyboard it
has to be fully integrated.
The point that has been made by some people, myself included is that it can
be an add on and it would have to offer more than a155 (just as you
intimate).
David
bakis Sirros
<synth_freak_2000@ To:
Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com
yahoo.com> cc:
Subject: Re:
1 A little about that touch keyboard
27/02/2002 13:47 Header: Internal Use Only
Please respond to
Doepfer_a100
ooooooo.......don't you understand that this sequencer
NEEDS to be with the sensor keyboard the keys of the
keyboard are used for activating steps/changing
seq.lenght on the fly!!!so,it is nessessary to have a
touch-sensor keyboard/sequencer!!!!!!!!!
synthfreak
---
davevosh@...
wrote:
> In a message dated 2/26/2002 12:12:07 PM Eastern
> Standard Time,
>
andreas.k.lindholm@...
writes:
>
>
> > If the touch keyboard would amount to anything
> good I would say that it
> > should either exclude all sequencer functions or
> they should be very
> > carefully thought out. There is as far as I
> understand it no point in adding
> > something that if very limited when there are
> several other solutions to do
> > it better.
>
>
>
> hello !
> i must agree here wholeheartedly ! better a
> superior touch kybd / controller
> than a mediocre sequencer. after the kybd is
> completed, take a second look a
> sequencing and envelope generation using something
> still visionary, even
> after all these years, like the old buchla multiple
> arbitrary random function
> generator as a conceptual starting point.
> let each module "be what it is" and avoid "creeping
> feature-itis" ..........
> best,
> dave
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been
> removed]
>
>
=====
synthfreak(parallel worlds)
athens-greece
1 group owner-moderator
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
doepfer_a100-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
------------------------------------------------------------- ---
Visit our Internet site at
http://www.reuters.com
Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual
sender, except where the sender specifically states them to be
the views of Reuters Ltd.
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT
<
http://rd.yahoo.com/M=217097.1902236.3397169.1261774/D=egroupweb/S=17050321
44:HM/A=960173/R=0/*
http://service.bfast.com/bfast/click bfmid=29150849&site
id=39249818&bfpage=moneyyahoo4>
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
doepfer_a100-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service
<
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> .
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]