No I don't think it is. It is just another set of those "unnessecary
features that you think should be there";-)

I think you have been the most avid of the lot to keep things cheap and
stripped down. Now you ask for things to be included again. It just doesn't
make sense the way you and Florian on one hand think that crippled machines
should stay that way to make it cheap and the next second vote for umpteen
new features that are suddenly vital. It would be nice to hear about your
general philosophy regarding price vs. features. I hope it isn't just a
display of less self-centeredness. I try keep an open and modular mind i.e.
make things simple but offer possibilities of expansion so everybody can
decide for themselves what is vital and what is not rather than declaring
what people do need. I have met a few users of musictechnology and found
that not even users with the same gear work the same.

Furthermore I find endless rows of exclamation marks a bit on the unserious
side, but perhaps that is just me. I just try to stick to standard
netiquette...

/Andreas

----- Original Message -----
From: "bakis Sirros" < synth_freak_2000@... >
To: < Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com >
Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 2:47 PM
Subject: Re: 1 A little about that touch keyboard


> ooooooo.......don't you understand that this sequencer
> NEEDS to be with the sensor keyboard the keys of the
> keyboard are used for activating steps/changing
> seq.lenght on the fly!!!so,it is nessessary to have a
> touch-sensor keyboard/sequencer!!!!!!!!!
> synthfreak
>
> --- davevosh@... wrote:
> > In a message dated 2/26/2002 12:12:07 PM Eastern
> > Standard Time,
> > andreas.k.lindholm@... writes:
> >
> >
> > > If the touch keyboard would amount to anything
> > good I would say that it
> > > should either exclude all sequencer functions or
> > they should be very
> > > carefully thought out. There is as far as I
> > understand it no point in adding
> > > something that if very limited when there are
> > several other solutions to do
> > > it better.
> >
> >
> >
> > hello !
> > i must agree here wholeheartedly ! better a
> > superior touch kybd / controller
> > than a mediocre sequencer. after the kybd is
> > completed, take a second look a
> > sequencing and envelope generation using something
> > still visionary, even
> > after all these years, like the old buchla multiple
> > arbitrary random function
> > generator as a conceptual starting point.
> > let each module "be what it is" and avoid "creeping
> > feature-itis" ..........
> > best,
> > dave
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been
> > removed]
> >
> >
>
>
> =====
> synthfreak(parallel worlds)
> athens-greece
> 1 group owner-moderator
>
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> doepfer_a100-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>