Martin,

As far as the 121/108 choice: I would definately say the 108 as it sounds really good. I
particulary like the 6db/oct output which is so nice and subtile. It also has a 48db/oct
output which will suit other needs.
Then again also having an a121 I'd say the notch filter on this one is very good.
However for high pass filter I would recommend the a123.

Greetings,

Ernst

--- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com , "martin_rudling" <martinrudling@h...> wrote:
> Hi. If you´ve been logged off for a while and happen to see this
> message, please don´t pass it by just because it´s some weeks old,
> every comment that I received so far has led to important adjustments
> in my sys-planning!
>
> Right now I would be very happy for some advice regarding the choice
> of filters!
>
> For example, anyone could say something about choosing A108-filter or
> A121 Multimode fltr Also very uncertain about choosing A124-Wasp
> filter or A106-1Extreme filter.( )
>
> Thank you very much Ingo for yr help. I removed one of the a134 VC-
> panning and added an a175 inverter as you suggested. One thing that I
> did NOT do, as you will see, is to add another LFO. This is because
> of my intentions of using ONE "master tempo" generated from a single
> lfo, and then reproduce (using multiples) different versions of it
> with the clock dividers, (please tell me if this isn´t realistic!).
> Then I aim to "mix" these different versions to generate a sum -
> internally synced - lfo, then send this to VCA, VC-panning and VCF.
> For this I would obviously have a lot help from the future
> model "a143-4" which still is at development stage. (no release date
> planned so far, D Doepfer replied this morning; after I had expressed
> my wishes to him in an e-mail yesterday...)
>
> Anyway. My own logic tells me I can do these things in other ways,
> and if someone has the opposite experience, please shout out to me
> very loud!!!
>
> I didn´t completely understand yr solutions that should make the
> second (now removed) a134 unnecessary, but of course I´m willing to
> believe you... Well, my intention with it was to use one of them as
> a regular panning mod, and the other to experiment with, for
> instance, shifting between to filters...
>
> Ok. Here comes the, since yesterday, updated list:
>
>
>
>
>
> >A110 Oscillator10TE
> >
> >
> >
> >A106-1 Extreme filter/// A106-1 Extreme Filter/// A108 LP/BP filter
> >
> >A121 Multimode filter/// A107 Morphing Filter/// A107 Morhing filter
> >
> >A124 Wasp filter/// (A124 Wasp fltr)/// (A 106-1 Extreme fltr)
> >
> >
> >
> >A131 VCA 8TE
> >
> >A131 VCA 8TE
> >
> >A132 Dual VCA
> >
> >A132 Dual VCA
> >
> >A134 VC Panning 8TE
> >
> >A136 Distortion Waveshaper 8TE
> >
> >A135 VC mixer
>
> A138A Mixer 8TE (linear)
> >
> >A138c polarizing mixer (could this module replace the one above or
> do you think I will find use for both )
> >
> >A145 LFO 8TE
> >
> >A143-2 Quad ADSR
> >
> >A160 Clock divider
> >
> >A161 Clock sequencer
> >
> >A163 VC clock divider
>
> A175 dual voltage inverter
> >
> >A180 Multiple 4TE
> >
> >A180 Multiple 4TE
> >
> >A190 Midi-CV10TE
> >
> > 1xBlind plate 2TE
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >From: "selfoscillate" <synaptic_music@y...>
> >Reply-To: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com
> >To: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com
> >Subject: 1 Re: new memb, planning issues
> >Date: Thu, 12 May 2005 07:23:12 -0000
> >
> >
> >hello martin,
> >
> >i'd throw in another vco and another lfo.
> >or exchange the a145 lfo with an a143/3 quad lfo,
> >if you don't need the sine out and retrigger input
> >of the a145.
> >
> >two a134 and an a135 seems to be quite unusual
> >for a starter system.
> >
> >another module which i use a lot is the a175 inverter,
> >especially because the a143/2 has no inverted outs.
> >this will maybe make the second a134 obsolete, because
> >you can reproduce a lot of the functionality of the a134
> >with the a135 or an a132 then.
> >
> >please also note that the a134 can only process audio signals
> >just like the a135. cv-processing is not possible with
> >a134 and a135.
> >
> >best wishes
> >
> >ingo