I just as fully disagree. An extra 2P on any two modules in a row and you
just lost space for a clock divider, sample-and-hold, ring mod, inverter, or
multiple. Couple that with the price of a G6 and you'll find yourself
spending hundreds of extra dollars/euros for the privilege of a nominally
neater rack.

--Chuck

-----Original Message-----
From: selfoscillate [mailto: synaptic_music@... ]
Sent: Monday, March 07, 2005 7:56 AM
To: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com
Subject: 1 Re: Instead of new module suggestions -> module size




hello florian,

i fully agree.

best wishes

ingo



--- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com , Florian Anwander
<Florian.Anwander@c...> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I received a lot of new modules the last weeks. So I rearranged the
> modules in my system ... and found it quite annoying, that there

are

> again modules with a width of uneven or impairy numbers of HPs. I

really

> would appreciate it, if the modules would have at least a width of

4HPs

> (like A180) and multiples of 4HPs.
>
> I wouldn't mind if some modules would have more surface space; this
> would make a more user friendly "interface". It would be easier

also to

> add input jacks or switches for optional features, which are given

on

> the pcb already.
>
> Any oppinions about that (I know that we would have to buy more

19"

> frames...)
>
> Florian