Enter your vote today! A new poll has been created for the
Doepfer_a100 group:

To what extent do you think Doepfer
should try to fix flaws and bugs in
the product line

o Nothing is more paramount. Bugs should be fixed first of all.
o If the users specificly asks for it to be fixed and want to pay for the upgrade it should be done at once otherwise it can wait.
o Faults should be fixed as soon as possible and superceed development of new modules unless users demand new modules.
o It depends on the nature of the flaw. Serious flaws at once others can wait.
o If it is questionable if it is a bug or a useful feature it is up to the maker to decide.
o In general I think it should be fixed within a year
o In general I think it should be fixed within a two years.
o In general I think it should be fixed in a time shoosen by the maker.
o Well, I say it is up to the buyer to check if the unit holds up to its promise. No it shouldn't be fixed unless it is written down in the manual.
o No. I prefer more stuff to be developed instead.


To vote, please visit the following web page:

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Doepfer_a100/polls

Note: Please do not reply to this message. Poll votes are
not collected via email. To vote, you must go to the Yahoo! Groups
web site listed above.

Thanks!