Oh, so A. Sol actually integrates with Doefper as well ! I totally missed
on that! Good to know! Yeah, the R 95 is supposed to sound really good after
what I've read as well, but I guess its nice to have somethin to look
forward to as well.. can't be bad having VCOs with different timbres!
Anyways it seems like I'll go for a Doepfer System to start with, it all
start to seem lke matters of degrees in heaven if you see what i mean... ;-)

Thanks for the input Joost!!
Regards /Anders

>From: "levka0" < levka@... >
>Reply-To: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com
>To: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com
>Subject: 1 Re: Integrator or Doepfer
>Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2004 21:18:28 -0000
>
>Hi there
>I have started off with some A-100 racks,and adding a few A.Sys. & A.
>Sol. modules later;
>they integrate wonderfully, although the A. Sys. modules require a
>custom powercable when running from doepfer rack buss.
>
>My advice would be to get at least all CV stuff from dopefer as the
>price/performance ratio is unbeatable. Add Some A.Sys/Sol. filters
>and/or VCO's to spice up your system, and you're in heaven. I prefer
>the A.Sys. RS500e diode filter over the A-102, but I guess it's also
>greatly a matter of personal taste
>I would love to hear an RS-95 in action some time, but an A-110/111
>combo has also a great sound
>
>I also do love the A.Sol. Sy02 filter, but I will get two A-106's for
>sure, once they are available
>
>regards
>Joost
>
>--- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com , "Anders Ehlin"
><anders_ehlin@h...> wrote:
> > Yeah, well I guess that's where you end up when you've gathered a a
>bunch of
> > modules and know from experience where your system lacks..
>hopefully that'll
> > be the truth for me as well in time. Right now, for me, it's more
>that I
> > want an as open as can be solution with as many doors as possibel
>left open
> > since my real life experience (apart from sitting around with my
>nord
> > modular for five years) on modulars is a bit limited.. But I was
>looking at
> > the MOTM system as well as certain Analogue Solution stuff as well,
>but
> > they're both (according to my reading at least) sort of dead ends
>when it
> > comes to combining modules inside racks of different brands. It's
>always
> > nice to know the possibility is there and the connection between
>Doepfer and
> > AS seem to be so established.
> >
> > So anyway, would you concider the AS VCOs and VCFs superior to
>Doepfer's I
> > know this is one of the most subjective areas, hard to say before
>you can
> > actually hear them side by side... (guess its like the mac/pc
>discussion or
> > whatever) but neverthless I have heard much good bout the AS
>filters, being
> > meaty and well sorted in the lower frequencies especially, though
>some mean
> > they overdrive to easily..
> >
> > /Anders
> >
> >
> > >From: bdu@f...
> > >Reply-To: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com
> > >To: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com
> > >Subject: Re: 1 Re: Integrator or Doepfer
> > >Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2004 11:36:01 -0700 (PDT)
> > >
> > >My preference thus far has been to get both.
> > >
> > >My ASys modules primarily take care of the bread and butter
>modules (Oscs,
> > >MMFilters, EGs, LFOs, VCAs) while my doepfer/3rd party stuff is
>doing
> > >cv/control like sequencing, logic switching, pattern generating,
>etc.
> > >
> > >Though I'll soon be blurring the line, I've got two PlanB Model12
>VCOs on
> > >preorder, and I'll likely pick up a couple of Doepfer A101-2 LPGs
>and
> > >A143-1 AD EGs to go with them for a mini buchla-ish system in a
>doepfer
> > >rack.
> > >
> > >-Brandon
> >
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > Chatt: Träffa nya nätkompisar på Habbo Hotel
> > http://habbohotel.msn.se/habbo/sv/channelizer
>

_________________________________________________________________
Chat: Ha en fest på Habbo Hotel
http://habbohotel.msn.se/habbo/sv/channelizer Checka in här!