hello josue,

first of all i want to say that i like the sound of the a111.
i will say more about the plan b vco when i have tried it.
i know the sounds from peters homepage, but i want to
lay my own hands on the vco before i'm going to say it
is more organic than other vco's.

i don't expect vco's to sound the same when they go through the
same waveshaper, but again, it is all a matter of taste what
sounds better. it looks like you already made that decision
for yourself, but i haven't, because i don't own any buchla
vco's or at least buchla-similar vco's yet.

best wishes

ingo



--- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com , "ALMAGATA@t..." <almagata@t...>
wrote:

> Hi Ingo, you can download the samples for the Plan-B VCO peter is
> making,
> do you think it sound the same as the A111 Do you think both A111

and

> planB VCO sound the same thru the a-116 or waveshaper Do you like

the

> sound of PlanB Do you think the planB Have an organic quality and
> a "new" sound on its own
> Just answer yourself! :)
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Josue.
>
> > i think this issue needs some more investigation.
> >
> > both points are valid, each solution has it's advantages.
> >
> > it is really difficult, because only few people have heard
> >
> > an original buchla 259 and know about the special behaviour
> >
> > of this unit.
> >
> >
> >
> > maybe we can get some raw recordings of the buchla 259
> >
> > from anywhere just to know what we are talking about.