The following Doepfer_a100 poll is now closed. Here are the
final results:


POLL QUESTION: To what extent do you think Doepfer
should try to fix flaws and bugs in
the product line

CHOICES AND RESULTS
- Nothing is more paramount. Bugs should be fixed first of all., 8 votes, 30.77%
- If the users specificly asks for it to be fixed and want to pay for the upgrade it should be done at once otherwise it can wait., 1 votes, 3.85%
- Faults should be fixed as soon as possible and superceed development of new modules unless users demand new modules., 1 votes, 3.85%
- It depends on the nature of the flaw. Serious flaws at once others can wait., 10 votes, 38.46%
- If it is questionable if it is a bug or a useful feature it is up to the maker to decide., 1 votes, 3.85%
- In general I think it should be fixed within a year, 1 votes, 3.85%
- In general I think it should be fixed within a two years., 0 votes, 0.00%
- In general I think it should be fixed in a time shoosen by the maker., 0 votes, 0.00%
- Well, I say it is up to the buyer to check if the unit holds up to its promise. No it shouldn't be fixed unless it is written down in the manual., 2 votes, 7.69%
- No. I prefer more stuff to be developed instead., 2 votes, 7.69%



For more information about this group, please visit
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Doepfer_a100

For help with Yahoo! Groups, please visit
http://help.yahoo.com/help/us/groups/