hello list,

just a short add to my post:
i'd like a version with polarizing mixer, no matter if
it is integrated or a separate module which can be connected
to the pcb. both will be fine for me.

best wishes

ingo



--- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com , "selfoscillate"
<synaptic_music@y...> wrote:

>
> hello list,
>
> i agree with kevin/rm. the internal connector is a really
> charming idea. the price for the a143-1 would be lower for
> all those who only want a more simple quad envelope, and all
> the rest will get more versatility, because the polarizing mixer
> can be used for other tasks too. imagine, we can also mix only
> two or three envelopes and use other voltages for the remaining
> polarizer inputs, as long as the polarizing mixer is separate.
> otherwise it wouldn't have inputs, right
> oh boy, this will be an amazing module. i'm happy.
> i'll take a look at the doepfer homepage immediately.
>
> best wishes
>
> ingo
>
>
> --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com , "klamb000" <lamb@c...
> > wrote:
> > Personally, I think RM's internal connector is the way to go, as

it

> > keeps this more modular.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Kevin
> >
> >
> > --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com , Bakis Sirros
> > <synth_freak_2000@y...> wrote:
> > >
> > > --- Dieter Doepfer <hardware@d...> wrote:
> > > > From: "Dieter Doepfer" <hardware@d...>
> > > > To: "Bakis Sirros" <synth_freak_2000@y...>
> > > > Subject: A-143-1 options
> > > > Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2004 19:10:43 +0100
> > > >
> > > > Dear Bakis,
> > > >
> > > > now I understand the A-143-1 poll results much
> > > > better. Last night I went
> > > > back to the roots and soldered/assembled the A-143-1
> > > > prototype myself (as
> > > > you know Roland Mayer fell ill) - the version with
> > > > integrated polarizing
> > > > mixer and threshold control for the comparator
> > > > output. And the voting
> > > > members are right: this is an absolute MUST HAVE
> > > > MODULE. Look at the revised
> > > > A-143-1 page for details. The 8-stage envelopes or
> > > > LFOs are really
> > > > phantastic. The only question is if we should
> > > > integrate the polarizing mixer
> > > > or prefer an external A-138c (four short patch
> > > > cables required). But even
> > > > RM's idea concerning an internal 4 way connector at
> > > > the A-138c (leading to
> > > > the switch contacts of the sockets) is really a good
> > > > idea. In this case the
> > > > mixer could be used for other jobs too. Probably a
> > > > new poll ... :-)
> > > > But as our decision will be made in any case after
> > > > the Frankfurt Messe we
> > > > still have time.
> > > >
> > > > Best wishes
> > > > Dieter Doepfer
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ANY COMMENTS,PLEASE MY OPINION IS THAT THE POLARIZING
> > > MIXER SHOULD BE INTEGRATED TO THE A143-1 QUAD AD!WHAT
> > > DO YOU THINK
> > > BAKIS.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > =====
> > > Bakis Siros
> > > Parallel Worlds / Polariton
> > > Athens-Greece
> > > 1 group owner
> > > http://www.rubber.gr
> > > http://www.shimarecords.co.uk
> > > http://www.ward12.com
> > >
> > > __________________________________
> > > Do you Yahoo!
> > > Yahoo! Search - Find what you're looking for faster
> > > http://search.yahoo.com