hello all,

yes, i'm also interested in modifications for the a135.
the reason why i suggested two cv-inputs is that this way
you could easily control the vca's with an envelope through
the exp-input for percussive sounds and then modulate it
(pan, tremolo etc) via the linear-input at the same time.

anyway i'm really interested in a mod for the a135.
can somebody give more details please

by the way, is it possible to build a linear-to-exponential
converter as a separate module i don't know if this would
make sense or is possible at all, but this could be
very interesting for all kinds of cv-controllable modules.

best wishes

ingo

--- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com , Paul Schulz <dasfonk@w...> wrote:
> Hi there!
>
> A quad VCA is definitely a good thing.
> I share the idea of two characteristics per VCA, but instead using
pots
> I´m in favor of a lin/exp switch.
> One audio input is enough and an attenuated CV-input is much more
> important than a gain pot (Sorry Julian, but I hardly use this
function).
>
> just my two cents...
> Paul
>
> PS: I just read John´s message. Yes, of course! The A-135 will do
the
> job too, and adding single outs should be no problem (yes, I like
DIY! ;-)
>
>
> selfoscillate wrote:
>
> >
> > hello list,
> >
> > just a question, after some ramblings regarding the quality
> > of the vca's (old a131 versus new a131 versus a132),
> > wouldn't it be a good idea to have a new quad vca
> > it would fit nicely into the a143-x range and it
> > seems that there is also room for improvements,
> > like linear and exponential cv-inputs for each vca
> > (similar to the analogue systems stuff).
> > a version without pots would fit on a 8 te frontplate
> > (like a doubled a132), with attenuators for the first
> > two vca's it would be 12 te wide (one pot for lin-cv input
> > and one pot for exp-cv input). what ya think about it
> >
> > best wishes
> >
> > ingo
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]