I think the end of attack idea is actually much better than my end
of cycle request. An end of cycle output would also be nice.
However, the inverting mixer section would add almost as much space
as a separate inverting mixer. I would prefer to just have them
side by side. I can understand if outher differ, and I would still
buy the module if it had the mixer.
I have been using a couple of Blacet Mixer/Processor modules that I
squeezed into 8hp Doepfer style front panels from Front Panel
Express. They are VERY handy. It would be great if Doepfer made
something like this.

--- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com , Bakis Sirros
<synth_freak_2000@y...> wrote:

> hello list,
> i think that now we can all vote for version 4 of the
> a143-1 quad AD generator/LFO.why because the a143-2
> quad LFO and the a143-3 quad ADSR will be released,
> so,a100 starters and a100 users who want to save some
> space and buy cheaper modules can buy the a143-2 or
> a143-2.if anyone wants something more complex and
> advanced, he can go for the a143-1.
> also,i think that version 4 should ,also, include the
> "end of attack" trigger outputs like the two previous
> versions of the a143-1.
> what do you think
> thanks,
> bakis.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> =====
> Bakis Siros
> Parallel Worlds / Polariton
> Athens-Greece
> 1 group owner
> http://www.rubber.gr
> http://www.ward12.com
>
> __________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!
> Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free web site building tool. Try it!
> http://webhosting.yahoo.com/ps/sb/