I think if the attack endpoint outputs are included on the module, it
would be vital to have the decay endpoint outputs there as well. You
will basically have the possibility to have quadrature relationships
with the eg's and the ability to retrigger them as well. brilliant
stuff.

I was lead to believe these were going to be simple eg's, now the
attack endpoint trig outs are there, it would be unwise not to have
the decay endpoint trig out as well.

I think a redesign should be done and a poll so people can choose
which version should be built.

Everyone remember how you like the A149, well these functions will
bring loads of possibilities. Imagine an A162 trig delay sitting
right beside this puppy or better still, how about a quad vc trig
delay. Oh the possibilities.

Now if only we could have voltage control of both the attack and
decay stages. ;)

Regards,
RM

--- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com , "shm1400" <shm14@h...> wrote:
> My comments regarding end of cycle outs and unconditional attacks
on
> the 143-1 did not generate very much enthusiasm. However, if the
EG
> already has a cycling option, it seems like the end of cycle
trigger
> might already be there. How about a patch point on the board for
> those of us who would be willing to drill a hole and solder to it
> And, maybe a jumper for unconditional attacks (Is this a lot
> harder )
>
> Just a suggestion. Like I said, I would definitely buy the module
if
> it came out as currently planned.
>
>
> --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com , "shm1400" <shm14@h...> wrote:
> > I agree the quad envelope looks great and I would definitely buy
> it
> > if it came out exactly as currently specified.
> >
> > Having said that, would it be difficult to provide an end of
cycle
> > trigger And, could the envelope be made "unconditional," so
that
> > the attack cycle happens regardless of the trigger state These
> > would open up lots of possibilities, if they could be easily
> added.
> > Probably not a good idea if they would increase the size of the
> > module.
> >
> > I would also prefer all jacks on the left, particularly if they
> > could be arranged vertically, 8 in a row (like on the multiple
> > module) This would also open up space for other functions (see
> > above). However, this might require either a separate PC board
> for
> > the jacks, or jacks on both sides of each PC. Obviously, I'm
just
> a
> > user and I don't know if this is feasible.
> >
> > --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com , Bakis Sirros
> > <synth_freak_2000@y...> wrote:
> > >
> > > --- Dieter Doepfer <hardware@d...> wrote:
> > > > From: "Dieter Doepfer" <hardware@d...>
> > > > To: "Bakis Sirros" <synth_freak_2000@y...>
> > > > Subject: AW: 1 Re: new pages for a143-1
> > > > quad envelope/lfo and a143-3 multi vc-lfo modules!
> > > > Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2004 11:22:47 +0100
> > > >
> > > > Please forward
> > > >
> > > > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> > > > > Von: selfoscillate
> > > > [mailto:synaptic_music@y...]
> > > > > Gesendet: Dienstag, 20. Januar 2004 12:55
> > > > > An: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com
> > > > > Betreff: 1 Re: new pages for a143-1
> > > > quad envelope/lfo and
> > > > > a143-3 multi vc-lfo modules!
> > > > >
> > > > > yes, a sum mix output with attenuator would be
> > > > nice.
> > > > > should still fit the 16 te width.
> > > > > a nice third option for the ad/lfo switch would be
> > > > > "triggered lfo", which means that the lfo only
> > > > runs
> > > > > when the gate input is high. another handy option
> > > > > would be, that the gate input also works as a
> > > > > retrigger input for the lfo.
> > > > >
> > > > > don't know if this is possible with the chosen
> > > > design,
> > > > > just some ideas.
> > > >
> > > > We will see. I have to point out that due to the
> > > > design (555 timer circuit
> > > > used) the AD will in the 0...8V range (0 ... 2/3
> > > > supply voltage) and the
> > > > "LFO" in the 4V...8V range (1/3 ... 2/3 supply
> > > > voltage). So I'm not sure if
> > > > the sum will make sense. From my point of view AD
> > > > summing is not as
> > > > important as LFO summing. But in this case each LFO
> > > > contributes a 6V offset
> > > > (medium of 4V and 8V) to the sum output. The
> > > > provisional calculation is
> > > > based on the 555 timer circuit. To obtain an LFO
> > > > without offset we would
> > > > have to redesign the circuit completely (replace the
> > > > 555 by discrete
> > > > components with other features).
> > > > For the Gate and Reset feature I will see if this is
> > > > possible for the 555
> > > > design.
> > > >
> > > > Best wishes
> > > > Dieter Doepfer
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > =====
> > > Bakis Siros
> > > Parallel Worlds / Polariton
> > > Athens-Greece
> > > 1 group owner
> > > http://www.rubber.gr
> > > http://www.ward12.com
> > >
> > > __________________________________
> > > Do you Yahoo!
> > > Yahoo! Hotjobs: Enter the "Signing Bonus" Sweepstakes
> > > http://hotjobs.sweepstakes.yahoo.com/signingbonus