--- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com , Bakis Sirros
<synth_freak_2000@y...> wrote:

>
> --- Dieter Doepfer <hardware@d...> wrote:
> > From: "Dieter Doepfer" <hardware@d...>
> > To: "Bakis Sirros" <synth_freak_2000@y...>
> > Subject: AW: 1 Poll results for
> > Doepfer_a100
> > Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2003 13:13:57 +0100
> >
> > > The following Doepfer_a100 poll is now closed.
> > Here are the
> > > final results:
> > >
> > >
> > > POLL QUESTION: What features would you want to be
> > > included in the forthcoming A101-2
> > > LOWPASS GATE MODULE (more feature
> > > increase the price and enlarge the
> > > front panel).you can vote for more than
> > > one choices,of course.
> > >
> > > CHOICES AND RESULTS
> > > - Simply to be a copy of the Buchla 292 module(no
> > CV and audio
> > > attenuators, no resonance, no gate inputs), 2
> > votes, 3.85%
> > > - Additional attenuator for CV and audio inputs,
> > 11 votes, 21.15%
> > > - Additional resonance feature, 13 votes, 25.00%
> > > - additional gate control of function, 10 votes,
> > 19.23%
> > > - single module, 3 votes, 5.77%
> > > - dual module, 10 votes, 19.23%
> > > - triple module, 0 votes, 0.00%
> > > - quad module, 0 votes, 0.00%
> > > - integrated output mixer, 3 votes, 5.77%
> >
> > As mentioned earlier I cannot see the advantage of a
> > dual module (19.23%)
> > without output mixer (5.77%). I tend to the single
> > module as a dual module
> > has no advantages from my point of view and everyone
> > could decide if he want
> > one, two or more LP Gate modules.
> >
> > I think the single version could be available early
> > 2004 as we found out a
> > lot concerning vactrol applications in the meantime.
> > We think about
> > publishing more details (e.g. graph of connection
> > between LED current and
> > LDR resistance, required VC current source for best
> > control) on our web
> > site.

yes, more info would be cool.

i also agree with the lowpass gate,
a single module would be best in my opinion.