Whatever goes into making the mysterious quality refered to as bottom-
end, I don't think the A-111s are particularly more notable for it
than the A-110s are. I consider the A-111s more reedy and precise
than my Analogue Systems RS-90s, which I find to have a much rounder
and Moogier quality and I'd choose if I were looking for a rounder
type of bass. Of course with the A-120 and RS-100 filters, you're
dealing with Moog ladders whose character is going to be different
from an SH101 filter regardless. I much prefer the RS-100 to the A-
120, actually.


--- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com , "nectarios01" <nectariosm@h...>
wrote:

> It is not the lack of character I am talking about, but the lack of
> the bottom end that the A-100 has compared to the Sh-101.
>
> Using the 24dB/8ve transistor ladder filters on my system (A-120,

RS

> 100), I find that I have to shelf 100Hz by +3dB on the Joemeek
> VC1Qcs EQ before I get the same bootom end (in level, not as tight)
> as the Sh-101.
> Does the A-111 output substantialy more bottom end that the A-110
> I am going to get a couple anyway since the A-111 waveforms are a
> bit different to the A-110's (and for the extra features), but I'd
> just like to know what to expect in the bottom end region.
>
>
> Peace out.