Not bad. You are fast Kevin :) That seems like a good module, but I'd rather
have + 12 or + 15 than 2.5 or is it 25 Cause some other brands of modulars
and old synths use higher gatevalues and it is good to have a module that
gaps that span I think. I like to mix my gear as much as possible.

So as it is now the later (included audio capability) makes the new advanced
version in the survey. One more advanced and one basic attenuator in the
same module. Nice.

/Andreas

----- Original Message -----
From: "code_pig" < code_pig@... >
To: < Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com >
Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2003 8:28 PM
Subject: 1 Re: The definition of a new attenuator


> Andreas,
>
> Thanks very much for the vote of confidence. I've taken what you
> said and tried to incorporate it into the propossed module. You'll
> find the results here:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Doepfer_a100/files/offset_module_2.jpg
>
>
> Regards,
> Kevin
>
> --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com , "Andreas Lindholm"
> <andreas.k.lindholm@t...> wrote:
> > David Salter asked for a definition of the advanced attenutator in
> the
> > poll. Since it is a vast majority that is pro an attenuator it is
> perhaps
> > time to start diskussion of the features.
> >
> > As I see it this sketch from Kevin is a very good suggestion that
> falls
> > somewhere between what I had in mind as a basic or advanced
> attenutator.
> >
> >
> > > I've put a JPG in the files section
> > >
> ( http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Doepfer_a100/files/offset_module_1.jpg)
> > > of what I'd be quite happy with.
> >
> > I actually find this proposed module so good that I think it should
> be made
> > as it is. Others have proposed ability to use it for audio purposes
> and that
> > wouldn't be bad. For me audiocapability is one thing that I would
> definitly
> > sort into the advanced version. Further more I think an advanced
> version
> > should have an output limit switch so you can be sure that it never
> boost
> > the signal about say 10 volts and risk blowing other modules with
> it.
> >
> > I like the proposed a133 from Kevin in its setup with one in and
> three out
> > cause it suits me, but I can also see that other options could be
> good so
> > perhaps a good compromise could be to do as with the 180. The buyer
> can
> > choose if he wants it configured as 2-2 or 1-3 for each attenuator.
> >
> > Final word lets say Kevins proposal is the basic dual alternative 2.
> > Everybody that want more features than is proposed please for for
> > alternative 1. As for if it is possible to put in a knob in 4 or 6
> width I
> > am not sure, but it seemed to fit when I glanced at the surface.
> But perhaps
> > the backside needs more space. Perhaps it could be a knob as the
> one used
> > for range selection in the vcos
> >
> > Perhaps in the end we will get a whole range of attenuators. The
> ideal would
> > be a slim single, the proposed dual and an advanced attenuator with
> voltage
> > control, audio capability and max output switch
> >
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Kevin
> > >
> > > --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com , David Salter
> <david.salter@r...>
> > > wrote:
> > > > Define advanced.
> > > >
> > > > regards
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > David Salter
> > > > Reuters Consulting
> > > > Tel: +44 20 7542 2402
> > > > Mob: +44 7990562402
> > > > Fax: +44 20 7542 2699
> > > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com
> > > > [mailto: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com ]
> > > > Sent: 25 March 2003 18:42
> > > > To: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com
> > > > Subject: 1 New poll for Doepfer_a100
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Enter your vote today! A new poll has been created for the
> > > > Doepfer_a100 group:
> > > >
> > > > Would you like Doepfer to make an
> > > > attenutator module
> > > >
> > > > Regarding more detailed layout we will
> > > > conduct a later survey about that.
> > > >
> > > > o Yes, an advanced one
> > > > o Yes, but only a basic dual attenuator
> > > > o Yes, but only a simple single
> > > > o Not sure
> > > > o No
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > To vote, please visit the following web page:
> > > >
> > > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Doepfer_a100/surveys
> > > id=11076862
> > > >
> > > > Note: Please do not reply to this message. Poll votes are
> > > > not collected via email. To vote, you must go to the Yahoo!
> > > > Groups
> > > > web site listed above.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks!
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
> > > > ADVERTISEMENT
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> < http://rd.yahoo.com/M=246920.2960106.4328965.2848452/D=egroupweb/S=17
> > > 05
> > > >
> > >
> 032144:HM/A=1481646/R=0/* http://www.gotomypc.com/u/tr/yh/cpm/grp/300_f
> > > la
> > > > ke/g22lp Target=mm/g22lp.tmpl>
> > > >
> > > > < http://us.adserver.yahoo.com/l
> > > M=246920.2960106.4328965.2848452/D=egrou
> > > > pmail/S=:HM/A=1481646/rand=219594600>
> > > >
> > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > > > doepfer_a100-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
> > > > Service < http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ > .
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------
> -
> > > > Visit our Internet site at http://www.reuters.com
> > > >
> > > > Get closer to the financial markets with Reuters Messaging - for
> > > more
> > > > information and to register, visit
> http://www.reuters.com/messaging
> > > >
> > > > Any views expressed in this message are those of the
> individual
> > > > sender, except where the sender specifically states them to
> be
> > > > the views of Reuters Ltd.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > > doepfer_a100-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> > >
> > >
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> doepfer_a100-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>