I just added a vote about the need for an attenuator. As I thought it,
alternative 1 is something like what I proposed earlier with switches for
maximum output levels 5/10/12/15 volts, pos and negative attenutation and
two or more "channels". The second something more like a stripped two
channels version of the a129/3 and alternative 3 some thing like a 4 width
module for one channel. Perhaps like a 180 with just one pot, one input and
three jacks out of the same.

----- Original Message -----
From: < Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com >
To: < Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com >
Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2003 7:41 PM
Subject: 1 New poll for Doepfer_a100


>
> Enter your vote today! A new poll has been created for the
> Doepfer_a100 group:
>
> Would you like Doepfer to make an
> attenutator module
>
> Regarding more detailed layout we will
> conduct a later survey about that.
>
> o Yes, an advanced one
> o Yes, but only a basic dual attenuator
> o Yes, but only a simple single
> o Not sure
> o No
>
>
> To vote, please visit the following web page:
>
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Doepfer_a100/surveys id=11076862
>
> Note: Please do not reply to this message. Poll votes are
> not collected via email. To vote, you must go to the Yahoo! Groups
> web site listed above.
>
> Thanks!
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> doepfer_a100-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>