I've been doing that, as well as using an inverter. But really, I'd
rather just have an offset module.

Regards,
Kevin

--- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com , "pstnotpd" <psm@w...> wrote:
> So why don't you run a +5 and the original signal through a linear
> 138 That should do the trick, though it wouldn't save much space
or
> money I suppose..... But then again, mixers are always usefull.
>
> --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com , "code_pig" <code_pig@y...>
wrote:
> > Actually, I just wanted a dual offset module because I really
don't
> > need (or have room for) and A129/3.
> >
> > I mean, I don't want to whine, but I really don't think it should
> be
> > necessary for one to purchase the A129/3 (which really can't be
> fully
> > expolited without the A129/4 Controller) when all one may need is
a
> > couple of offset generators.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Kevin
> >
> > --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com , "jmaddocks1975"
> > <jmaddocks1975@y...> wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > I agree, this is something I am looking at building.
> > > My a129 never gets used and I really want a fixed filter, so if
I
> > can
> > > make a module with 15 pots to control the a129/2 I got one.
> > > Any ideas of best way to make it
> > >
> > > John
> > > --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com , "pstnotpd" <psm@w...>
wrote:
> > > > Wouldn't that be fairly easy to make yourself A number of
pots
> > 15
> > > > running from the internal power. Something like a CV source+
so
> > > that
> > > > the 129 could be used as a filter bank, but much cheaper an
> space
> > > > consuming.
> > > > Or am I getting you wrong
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com , "code_pig"
<code_pig@y...>
> > > wrote:
> > > > > This might have already been discussed, but...
> > > > >
> > > > > I know the A129/3 does offsets, but might there be room for
> > > > something
> > > > > like a simple dual offset generator module
> > > > >
> > > > > Regards,
> > > > > Kevin