I think the problem there lies in the A-145 having only a +/-2.5 volt range. That is pretty low for a LFO, lower than the A-143-3, A-143-4 and most other companies LFOs. I understand your disagreement but one can say if you need a larger modulation range, use a A-183-3 or similar module. Maybe the compromise could be with an internal jumper for the range of the variable CV in. That would satisfy both purposes.
-James

> On Oct 28, 2017, at 3:35 AM, Florian Anwander fanwander@... 1 < Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com > wrote:
>
> Hello
>
> On 27.10.17 20:25 , james.husted@... 1 wrote:
>> Dieter - Please consider the option of making the variable CV in (on modules that have them) work so if the input attenuator is turned all the way up, that input tracks at 1v/Oct. This is a very convenient and useful alternative too.
> I am strictly against this request. You need a much higher modulation
> amount. Imagine an filtermodulation by the A-145, which would be limited
> to a +/- 2.5-Octave range: Assume, your cutoff is at 100Hz (which is
> around the second overtone for a low bass), then you would not be able
> to open the filter by the LFO more than to 320Hz!!!!
>
> If I need 1V/Oct, then there is already a dedicated 1V/Oct-Input. If I
> need two of them for one module I will have an precision adder in front
> of the module
>
> Florian
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> ------------------------------------
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Yahoo Groups Links
>
>
>