hi ringmod,
please fell free to do another poll.
bakis.


--- ringmod45 < ringmod45@... > wrote:

>
>
> Hi List,
>
> thanks to everyone who voted in the poll for the
> forthcoming new A107
> CEM 3372 filter based on the Erwik/Matrix 12 model.
> this should give
> a basic idea to Doepfer of what list members had to
> say on the
> subject.
>
> 19 people voted in the poll. multiple questions were
> asked in the
> A107 poll. in order to get the proper %'s for each
> of the questions.
> i divided the answers by the total of number persons
> who voted in the
> poll.
>
> #1) would you like to have all 15 filter types of
> the original
> Matrix 12 plus the New Ones being developed by
> Doepfer
>
> 18 votes, 15.25% 18/19 = 94%
>
> #2) would you like the ability to morph smoothly
> through all the
> filter types ,
>
> 18 votes, 15.25% 18/19 = 94%
>
> #3)would you like to have the Hard switching option
> on the final
> output VCA ,
>
> 12 votes, 10.17% 12/19 = 63%
>
> #4) would you like to have one or more memories to
> sequence the
> filter types for the Voltage Control Filter
> Selection input
>
> 9 votes, 7.63% 9/19 = 47%
>
> #5) would you like to have the filter Self
> Oscillate (if possible)
>
> 12 votes,10.17% 12/19 = 63%
>
> #6) would you like to have Voltage Control of the
> Resonance
>
> 18 votes, 15.25% 18/19 = 94%
>
> #7) would you like to have an extra Voltage Control
> Input with an
> Attenuator (i.e. one fixed input and two inputs with
> Attenuators like
> the A120)
>
> 17 votes, 14.41% 17/19 = 90%
>
> #8) would you like to have input and an attenuator
> to control the
> time base the Voltage Control Filter Type Selection
> memory sequence
> ( please refer to the post with" A107 Time Base
> Input" in the subject
> header)
>
> 14 votes, 11.86% 14/19 = 74%
>
>
> so there you have it. 9 persons voted for question
> #4 and 14 persons
> voted for question #8. question #8 is directly
> related to question
> #4, so the results of #4 should be closer to #8 for
> question #8 to
> have any validity. i don't believe this would be as
> costly to
> implement as the morphing feature. it would be a
> great function for
> sonic mangling and sound design.
>
> the next question we need to ask ourselves is, How
> much do we want to
> pay for this morphing function 18 of 19 people or
> 94% of you voted
> to have this feature. so judging by what Mr.Doepfer
> wrote about the
> price options described in Digest # 2457 and the
> suggestion from
> Bakis to do a poll concerning the pricing structure
> of the A107, it
> is obvious some of these results might be useful if
> price does become.
>
> i think there should be two versions of the A107.
> one with all the
> features that were voted in this poll and the other
> with less
> features to match the more simple layouts of the
> A120, A122, A123,
> A124.etc. having just a simple function set and
> layout for this
> filter would be a shame due to the sonic
> possibilities laying there
> with the features that were voted for in the poll.
>
> oh well, i guess it really boils down to people's
> pocket books. for
> me, the more creative possibilities and esoteric
> functions on a
> module determines my decision to buy it and not the
> price.
>
> so Bakis, would you like me to do another to
> solidify the price to
> function ratio
>
> regards,
> RM
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

=====
synthfreak(parallel worlds)
athens-greece
1 group owner-moderator

__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!
HotJobs - Search new jobs daily now
http://hotjobs.yahoo.com/