I say keep the switches. I don't have th on my quad slope but I really, really wish it did! I'd rather an offset/attenuator for the far fewer times I've used bipolar outs.

Ymmv of course.

Sent from my iPhone

On Dec 14, 2012, at 4:49 AM, Martin Fay < martin@... > wrote:

> Bit of a late entry here, but there appears to be a choice between
> including the cycle switch (not found on a stock STS DUSG) or a
> bipolar output (present).
>
> Cycle can be patch-programmed with a patch cord from Gate to Trigger,
> then if Gate is used for anything else it would need to be mult-ed.
>
> Bipolar can be patch-programmed using i.e. an offset/attenuator module.
>
> Is this trade-off worth a poll at some point
>
> Martin
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On 12 Dec 2012, at 15:11, < yahoo@... > wrote:
>
> > As the negotiations with Serge and Ken Stone are nearly finished I
> > decided
> > to publish the preliminary info page about the planned module on our
> > website:
> >
> > www.doepfer.de/a1712.htm
> >
> > Maybe we will add some features so that 3-position switches can be
> > used
> > (e.g. log/lin/exp instead of log/lin only and two different cycle
> > modes).
> > But these decisions depend upon the results with the first prototype
> > which I
> > expect in January 2013.
> >
> > Best wishes
> > Dieter Doepfer
> >
> >
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]