It may be interesting to be able to burst all stored voltages
simultaneously as well.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* * *
David Salter
Senior Consultant
Solutions Services EMEA North


Thomson Reuters

O +44 (0)20 7542 2402X 52402
M 07990562402

david.salter@...
thomsonreuters.com < http://thomsonreuters.com/ >



________________________________

From: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com [mailto: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com ]
On Behalf Of yahoo@...
Sent: 02 August 2011 13:48
To: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com
Subject: AW: AW: 1 Shift Register

> I would surely buy a multiple output digital module that included
> a number of digitally generated CV functions including an ASR.
> Because if one is going to go the route of using a
> microcontroller, one could include multiple function options on
> one module.
>
> Nick

Thank you for your detailed answer. We already discussed the chance of
multiple functions in the company. One could treat the ASR as kind of a
ring
memory that could be "filled" in different ways. E.g. from a CV source
via
AD conversion (the usual ASR) but also via Midi or USB. The ring memory
could be looped or not by means of a simple switch. One could combine
the
module with arpeggiator functions, e.g. fill the memory by playing a
chord
on a keyboard and then use only one of the CV outputs. One may also fill
it
with several analog CVs and the filling could be triggered by a gate
signal
(i.e. output of a sequencer or a CV/gate keyboard). That way one could
combine several similar functions in one module. From my point of view
this
would make more sense than a pure ASR. One could combine the functions
of an
ASR, arpeggiator and and a rudimental digital sequencer. For ASR the
number
of steps could be limited e.g. to 3 or 4, for the arpeggiator and
sequencer
more steps make sense. A lot of ideas for the long evenings of the
upcoming
fall and winter .... :-)

Best wishes
Dieter Doepfer





This email was sent to you by Thomson Reuters, the global news and information company. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the sender specifically states them to be the views of Thomson Reuters.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]