> Dieter,
>
> the main point of the ASR is that one very clock pulse, you get a
> different value on *all* outputs, with all outputs with a number
> greater than 1 showing the "history" of the input CV. The A-152
> will hold the last value on each destination defined at the point
> that that stage became inactive. So the output value of a stage
> is updated only when it becomes active. Very different from an ASR.
>
> One usage example of an ASR is routing a melodic CV sequence to a
> number of VCOs --- think "canon": the same melody played by all
> vcos with one sequence step delay between them.
>
> Actually I think that an AD/DA based ASR with quantisation
> options and perhaps 8 or even 16 stages & outputs could be a very
> successful module.
>
> Best,
> Denis Goekdag

Denis,

I still have problems to understand the audible difference in case of e.g.
three VCOs. The only difference between the A-152 and an ASR is that the
"history" CVs are available at different outputs. In case of an ASR the
"history" voltages are shifted to the next CV outputs. In case of the A-152
they remain at the same CV output. But from my point of view this does not
make an audible difference (unless you insert e.g. slew limiters between ASR
CV Out and VCO CV In) as the three CV output voltages are the same. They
only appear at different sockets. If the VCOs are equivalent this should
make no difference. please correct me if I'm wrong.

Dieter