For those who's grain is gone against with the idea of a digitally
based delay: Keep an open mind!

I mean this with the greatest respect - please don't read any
email anger here, there is none. My whole point being however
for some things, a digital heart is far superior for both sonic and
control possibilities - reverb, delay and flanging among them.
Not to mention envelope generators and other complex CV
generators.

If anyone doubts the quality of, let's say, a digital reverb - have
listen to TC Electronics' 6000 - it's utterly amazing. Of course, it's
$12,000 USD for a single unit!

But there are other far less expensive alternatives for
incorporating micro p's and DSPs (OK, i said it) in analog
applicaitons.

Imagine a polyphonic oscillator which would respond to both
MIDI AND analog VC. Or a 5.1 panner, or a trigger/voltage to
midi converter which would allow not only full control of any midi
instrument, but would enable a user to record events on a midi
sequencer such as Cubase. WIth digital, the possibilities are
endless!

-- In Doepfer_a100@y..., Stinchcombe Timothy
<tstinchcombe@q...> wrote:

> Hi Florian (again!)
>
> > > I bet you ONLY reason Doepfer has not produced an

analog VC

> > > delay is the main part needed to do so, the bucket brigade

chip,

> > > is now obsolete and in very short supply worldwide.
> > This is basically true. But a BBD delay would not be the only
> > available
> > technology.
>
> Again, what other technologies are you thinking of here A

digital delay probably goes against the grain with some people,
so the only other thing I can think of off the top of my head would
be a tape loop!

>
> Tim
>
> [The views expressed above are entirely those of the writer and

do not represent the views, policy or understanding of any other
person or official body. Personal email. This email is personal. It
is not authorised or sent on behalf of the sender's employer.
This email is the personal responsibility of the sender.]

>
>
>
> The Information contained in this E-Mail and any subsequent

correspondence

> is private and is intended solely for the intended recipient(s).
> For those other than the recipient any disclosure, copying,

distribution,

> or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on such

information

> is prohibited and may be unlawful.