Hello Dieter!

The concept I laid out has only one additional CV in and one additional switch per part (as compared to your last mockup). I just wanted to throw out an image of a perfect version of this module for me.

However, I do take your considerations to heart. I realize that you need a practical module that you can ship!

Of the current versions in debate, I would love the version with sync/reset and stable tuning with range switches. I look forward to this and will save $ and space for it!

I have much respect for what you do, you offer great modules that do amazing work with no fuss!

--- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com , <yahoo@...> wrote:
>
> > This concept looks really nice. I missed the polling, but would
> > like to throw my 2 cents in. I would like the module to be as
> > simple as possible, but retain as much unique functionality as an
> > osc/lfo as possible.
> >
> > CV Ins: freq, waveshape/pwm, reset/sync
> >
> > Audio outs: osc 1-4 + common
> >
> > Knobs: tune 1-4 + common, waveshape/pwm manual control 1-4
> >
> > Switches: wave(tri/saw/rect) 1-4, range 1-4
> >
> > IMO - external attens, mults, and mixers could be used for all of
> > the features that are easily duplicated by other modules.
>
> The A-143-4 was planned as an triangle core VCLFO with the VCO range as an
> option (nothing but switching between two capacitor values). It was never
> planned as an VCO with all waveforms, PW/PWM and so on. For this the A-110-4
> Quad VCO with a sawtooth core is in the holding pattern.
>
> From my point of view it does not make sense to add one feature after the
> other to the A-143-4. It is a bit contradictorily if you say to keep it as
> simple as possible and then add a list of additional features that will
> double the width of the front panel.
>
> Best wishes
> Dieter Doepfer
>