I too agree with all of the comments below!



Just had a live show with the p9 as well, and I also had it pre patched.



With the p9, there was enough space for me to be able to pre-patch 3
voices on it-one for leads with LFO modulated cut-off; one for noisy FM,
also filtered and sent through bit crusher (tyme sefari); and another
for waveshaper also filtered (man the qmmg really shines here!).



With the Plan B mixer, I could send it off to separate channels. Again,
really great for live shows!



Ps. I may not have that many doepfer modules, but I guess this is about
the case hehe



-----Original Message-----
From: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com [mailto: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com ]
On Behalf Of davevosh@...
Sent: Monday, September 28, 2009 9:32 PM
To: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: 1 Great stage performance of the Doepfer
A100P9 portable cas...







so, we just found a great advantage of the Doepfer modular for stage
performance!

bakis,
everyone likes things for their own reasons - what works for me maybe
doesn`t appeal to someone else but everyone is valid in their own
contexts -
still, among advantages to doepfer modulars i have to list a) small
form-factor, i don`t mind the panel density b) to my ear, it sounds good
c)
widest array of modules on the market covering all but the most exotic
bases.
case in point, without wanting to start a "who`s is better" flame war,
the
aforementioned buchla 200e, sexy-as-hell and quite good sounding, on
closer
inspection did little my mini-footlocker didn`t but the mini-footlocker
was $15k less. the artists primary reason for favoring the buchla was
that
its elaborate, powerful switching and presetable programmabilty of
modules
was important to his music. i saw his point but............
best,
dave



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]