Don't forget a Quad VCA too. I think the "quad" line of modules should
encompass the major functions needed for the "standard" voice. We have
Quad LFO and EGs now the Quad VCA is controlled by one CV so not what
I want yet - and Quad VCOs would be a challenge to fit nicely in a
panel and be full featured but I am sure they would sell to many even
it they were not destined to be in a polyphonic system. Especially if
there were creative normalization implemented. Things like chained CV
inputs that would allow all VCOs to run from CV jack 1 in nothing was
plugged into 2,3 & 4 - or all VCAs in a quad module fed the same audio
in only jack 1 is used (quad panner with a A-144 or A-143-9) or
chained summed outputs to make a VC mixer. With creative normalizing
used on inputs, outputs, and CV ins these modules can super flexible
and easy to use for polyphonic and mono use.
-James

On Aug 28, 2009, at 12:18 AM, grimshaw_stuart wrote:

> quad adsr with separate inputs and outputs but with adsr pots
> common to all four envelpoes. four vc-adsr's gets a tad expensive.
> - ditto for a quad filter, although it's easy enough to control, say
> four multimode filters from one cv source. but again, very expensive
> and very big, although i suppose big is pretty inevitable if we're
> talking about a polyphonic modular.
> - and a quad slew limiter, with whatever buffers are needed to make
> it usable :)



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]