to have this on OS X would be sweet..
Is it anywhere near finished

On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 5:39 PM, j_inform3r < abstract.express@... > wrote:
>
>
> So has the A-112 program been ported to OS X yet I've been away for at
> least over a year so I figured there would be something. Or did everyone
> drop the ball on this one Am I the ONLY one who wants this software for
> Mac If I could program I would do it. Just wish it would it would happen
> already! :)
>
> -John
>
> --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com , Daniel Ornelas <danny@...> wrote:
>>
>> Hi John,
>>
>> I was just working on it last night actually, I've got the basic
>> transmission in and out worked out, I've just been quite
>> busy at work.
>>
>> I believe someone else on the list had something working also (anyone )
>>
>> At any rate, I want to get as close as I can to the Windows version, with
>> any luck (and time) i'll have it posted in the
>> next 2 weeks!
>>
>> Godspeed
>> ~Danny
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 11:04:33PM -0000, j_inform3r wrote:
>> > Hey guys,
>> > Whatever happened to the A-112 OS X editor It would be SO useful for so
>> > many users.
>> > Danny, do you still plan on going through with it
>> >
>> > Best Regards,
>> > John
>> >
>> > --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com , Daniel Ornelas <danny@> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > Howdy,
>> > >
>> > > I'm handy with C/C++ and Cocoa, i'd happily do it for free as I just
>> > > acquired this module :)
>> > >
>> > > Also, I'd work for free, for the benefit of all A-100 brethren!
>> > >
>> > > ~Danny
>> > >
>> > > On Dec 17, 2007, at 10:54 AM, <hardware@>
>> > > <hardware@> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > >> Doepfer has been relaeasing totally useless modules as CV
>> > > >> whatever or cloning existing vintage modules instead of helping
>> > > >> their former users.
>> > > >
>> > > > Most of these useless modules have been suggested and discussed by
>> > > > the
>> > > > members of this group !
>> > > >
>> > > > We never promised to have available Mac based editor programs as we
>> > > > have no
>> > > > programmer in the company who is familiar with Mac programming. I
>> > > > have
>> > > > mentioned this several times and there is a corresponding note on
>> > > > our
>> > > > website too. I understand that this is a drawback but I have no
>> > > > short-term
>> > > > solution. If there is somebody in this group who is able to program
>> > > > such a
>> > > > software I'd be happy to pay him for this job.
>> > > >
>> > > >> Same with MAQ 16/3 that with a newer OS could be an awesome
>> > > >> machine instead of a decorative item.
>> > > >
>> > > > If you tell me what you are missing we could try to start a
>> > > > discussion on a
>> > > > civilized base. We have already developed an improved main board for
>> > > > the
>> > > > MAQ16/3 (with more memory and CV/Gate outputs). So I think you
>> > > > cannot accuse
>> > > > us that there is no support for older devices. But please keep in
>> > > > mind that
>> > > > there are limitation due to the microprocessor used in the MAQ16/3
>> > > > (8051
>> > > > derivate) and not everything is possible that may be desirable. Even
>> > > > the
>> > > > available controls (only 8 buttons with LEDs and the 3-digit
>> > > > display) limit
>> > > > the possibilities for a software update. From my point of view even
>> > > > with the
>> > > > current software the controls are already a bit overstrained.
>> > > >
>> > > >> I think now that Doepfer is UNABLE to develope even a toaster (
>> > > >> What about a CV toaster,perhaps is more " Doepfer style..... )
>> > > >
>> > > > Excellent idea. How about a poll ;-)
>> > > >
>> > > > Best wishes
>> > > > Dieter Doepfer
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > Yahoo! Groups Links
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> > > Daniel Ornelas
>> > > danny@
>> > >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Yahoo! Groups Links
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>
>