Hehe. If one has 4HP of space left, a 4HP unit fits better of course.

Having a knob at each 4HP, makes the knob spacing same as in A-155
sequencer... not totally un-ergonomic. Still, I would prefer a 6HP 3-
channel unit. Space usage efficiency would be the same.

--- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com , "Steven Taylor" <steev@...>
wrote:

>
> The 4HP attenuator will fit perfectly in my minicase alongside the
> PlanB ELF modules I've got... and passive too. I'm sold :)
>
> S
>
> On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 2:47 PM, jalmari3 <jari.jokinen@...> wrote:
> > How about a 6HP 3-channel attenuator It could be possible, if the
> > jacks were in rows of two. Perhaps the ergonomics would be better
> > then due to more horizontal "headroom" for the knobs. (I would

prefer

> > all knobs up and all jacks down arrangement a la Cwejman, but

that is

> > just me.)
> >
> > --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com , "jalmari3" <jari.jokinen@>
> > wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> These are the only 4HP Doepfer modules with knobs, aren't they
> > Will
> >> the knobs be normal sized
> >>
> >> --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com , <yahoo@> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > We have added two simple modules to our list of planned

modules:

> >> >
> >> > A-183-1 simple passive dual attenuator
> >> > A-183-2 single offset generator/attenuator/polarizer/amplifier
> >> >
> >> > The modules are planned for combination with other modules that
> >> have no
> >> > attenuators and/or offset controls available. Mainly to

combine A-

> >> 100
> >> > modules with modules from other manufacturers because most of

the

> > A-
> >> 100
> >> > modules are already equipped with attenuator and manual control
> > of
> >> the
> >> > parameter in question.
> >> >
> >> > Details on our website: www.doepfer.com > PRODUCTS > A-100 >
> >> Future/new
> >> > modules
> >> >
> >> > Best wishes
> >> > Dieter Doepfer
> >> >
> >>
> >
> >
>