I don't get it... If the upgrade just filters the triangle in a better
way, then an LPF should do the same work. If your real concern is
additive synthesis, then perhaps you should get the digital RS370, or
a computer program. Or perhaps use self-oscillation on a filter that
has good tracking

On Dec 2, 2008, at 4:13 PM, laryn91 wrote:

> I wouldn't send mine back to Germany either.
>
> But I would buy upgrade boards and wire them in for all my Doepfer
> oscillators (110, 111,
> 145, etc.)
>
> --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com , Bakis Sirros
> <synth_freak_2000@...> wrote:
> >
> > ok, i could do that poll.
> > Dieter, any more specific details for the poll
> >
> > btw, in case there was a modified Sine circuit for the A111
> produced, i would be
> probably not bothered to send my 8 A111's back to doepfer to be
> 'converted' with the new
> sine design... it would be much trouble and time lost, for me...
> >
> >
> > Bakis Sirros - Parallel Worlds / Interconnected / Memory Geist
> > 1 group owner
> > www. parallel - worlds - music. com
> > www. myspace. com/ parallelworldsmusic
> > www. myspace. com/ interconnectedmusic
> > www. myspace. com/ memorygeist
> > www. DiN. org. uk
> > www. musicamaximamagnetica. com
> > www. shimarecords. co. uk
> > www. rubberrecords. gr
> > Athens - Greece
> >
> > --- On Wed, 12/3/08, york luethje <ybl@...> wrote:
> >
> > From: york luethje <ybl@...>
> > Subject: Re: 1 Re: Sine wave discussion - Poll
> suggestion
> > To: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com
> > Date: Wednesday, December 3, 2008, 12:52 AM
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Couldn't we just have a poll My suspicion is that the practical
> value of very good
> analogue sine waves will be high for only some. As Dieter posted, an
> earlier discussion
> then fizzled out and didn't result in any product modifications.
> Maybe the discussion has
> shown there there is indeed a lot of (commercially tangible)
> interest in an oscillator with a
> very good sine output. On the other hand, maybe the interest is more
> intellectual and
> doesn't incite people to actually part with their money and buy the
> new design. A poll
> could give us at least an indication. I suggest something like this
> >
> > "Do you want Doepfer to modify the sine-converter in the A-111 to
> produce a purer
> sine wave The cost increase would be in the 5% - 10% range."
> >
> > York
> >
> > ____________ _________ _________ __
> > From: Monroe Eskew <monroe.eskew@ gmail.com>
> > To: Doepfer_a100@ yahoogroups. com
> > Sent: Tuesday, December 2, 2008 3:39:52 PM
> > Subject: Re: 1 Re: Sine wave discussion
> >
> > Couldn't we just use a standard LPF for this
> >
> > On Dec 2, 2008, at 11:46 AM, James Husted wrote:
> >
> > > The part of this circuit that does the conversion seems pretty
> > > straight ahead and looks simple enough to make as a stan-alone
> module.
> > > If one was needing to make sines and had a triangle VCO already
> (that
> > > made a decent Triangle wave) then a converter module would work
> fine -
> > > a bit esoteric for mass production though.
> > > -James
> > >
> > > PS - sorry to all for starting this thread with my Z3000 post. I
> had
> > > my questions answered a long time ago..
> > >
> > > On Dec 2, 2008, at 10:38 AM, laryn91 wrote:
> > >
> > > > Sorry, I missed the "will" part :-p
> > > >
> > > > I had this link to the Aries VCO in one of the posts on this
> > > > (endless) thread. This is an
> > > > excellent tri-to-sine converter (I can't hear any additional
> > > > overtones). Better than the more
> > > > common 3080 converter and significantly better than your diode
> > > > converter. Aries claimed
> > > > to produce <1% THD.
> > > >
> > > > http://www.leinerme dia.net/aries/ AriesSchematics/ AR-317s.gif
> > > >
> > > > I'm not sure why you found adding a slightly filtered triangle
> > > > sounding wave useful when
> > > > there's already a triangle wave output. My suggestion is if your
> > > > customers are not
> > > > interested in a clean Sine output, use the panel real estate for
> > > > something more useful.
> > > >
> > > > --- In Doepfer_a100@ yahoogroups. com, <yahoo@> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > You find my answers written inline.
> > > > >
> > > > > Best wishes
> > > > > Dieter Doepfer
> > > > >
> > > > > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht--- --
> > > > > > Von: Doepfer_a100@ yahoogroups. com
> > > > > > [mailto:Doepfer_ a100@ yahoogroups. com]Im Auftrag von
> laryn91
> > > > > > Gesendet: Dienstag, 2. Dezember 2008 17:20
> > > > > > An: Doepfer_a100@ yahoogroups. com
> > > > > > Betreff: 1 Re: Sine wave discussion
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > And we will point out in the module information and user's
> > > > guide of
> > > > > A-110
> > > > > > > and A-111 that the sine outputs should be called more
> > > precisely
> > > > > "sine-like".
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Dieter,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > It's probably just me, but where do you point that out for
> the
> > > > A-111
> > > > >
> > > > > I wrote that "we will", not that "we did". That's the future
> tense
> > > > from what
> > > > > I learned in scool - but I'm not a native speaker.
> > > > >
> > > > > > >If you want a perfect sine you need a VCO with a sine core.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Instead of an impossible "perfect sine", how about just a
> sine
> > > > with no
> > > > > *audible* overtones
> > > > > > (<1% THD) like Arp, Moog, Aries, Polyfusion, EML,etc. used
> to
> > > > make That
> > > > > would now
> > > > > > make the A-111 useful for additive synthesis and FM.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > All you need to do is copy their simple but superior
> > > > > > triangle-to- sine converter design. ;-)
> > > > >
> > > > > Though I can't believe that they really reach <1% THD (but
> indeed
> > > > I never
> > > > > measured it): do you (or anybody else in the group) know the
> > > > circuitry of
> > > > > these converters. Are they made with diodes, OTAs or the JFET
> > > > circuit (these
> > > > > are the three triangle-to- sine converter principles I
> know). I
> > > > don't have
> > > > > the schematics of these VCOs.
> > > > >
> > > > > We would have offered a VCO with a more perfect sine in the
> past.
> > > > But it
> > > > > took more than 12 years (the A-111 is available since spring
> 1996)
> > > > until
> > > > > someone complained about the poor sine. I'll see what we can
> do.
> > > > Maybe we
> > > > > offer a small tri-to-sine converter board for the A-111-1
> that can
> > > > be used
> > > > > instead of the simple diode converter.
> > > > >
> > > > > There was a similar discussion about 2 years ago (~ September
> > > > 2006) and Tim
> > > > > Stinchcombe suggested an improved sine wave converter based
> on the
> > > > JFET
> > > > > principle. We have built a prototype of this converter in
> 2006 but
> > > > the
> > > > > discussion fell asleep very soon and it seemed that nobody was
> > > > interested
> > > > > anymore. We could dig this design and offer it as an
> addendum to
> > > > the A-111-1
> > > > > or equip all new A-111-1 with this board. The additional
> charges
> > > > would be in
> > > > > the 15 Euro range (about 10 electronical parts mounted on a
> small
> > > > board).
> > > > >
> > > > > Best wishes
> > > > > Dieter Doepfer
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
>
>
>



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]