> I've got the Malgorithm & an Alesis Bitrman. I've ordered the Doepfer
> unit and can post
> some examples once I get it.

if you've got the time that would be great but just your general
impression would do too!

> The Malgo and Bitrman are both excellent & can be set to do exactly the
> same sound in
> bit reduction mode. However, the Malgorithm is much more flexible in
> what it does.

the big difference between the malgorithm and the doepfer module is the
variable sample freq i guess, and that might persuade me in the end
because i could live without the vc input for going through the
different modes

but i wondered if the variable sample freq can also be versatile while
the sine (carrier ) wave isn't mixed in with the signal too obvious if
you know what i mean. i mean can it be fun without bleeping too loud

> They are two different beasts and I'm happy to have both. I'll get back
> with info on the
> A-189-1 when I've got it.

great man! i appreciate it,

greetz, anton

>
> --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com
> <mailto:Doepfer_a100%40yahoogroups.com>, "freq_divider" <freq.div@...>
> wrote:
> >
> > I wonder if anyone has compared directly the harvestman malgorithm and
> > the doepfer bit cruncher I've heard the excellent doepfer examples by
> > Soy Sos and i saw some malgorithm action on youtube but i'm not sure
> > about which one i prefer (if you forget the price difference and only
> > compare the sound).
> >
> > greetz, anton
> >
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com
> Version: 8.0.169 / Virus Database: 270.7.0/1685 - Release Date: 9/22/2008 4:08 PM
>