The CV-Control is an argument, but the moogerfooger has the important CV-Controls in my opinion,
feedback, time, and mix. And you have the option to insert a chain of other modules or moogerfoogers
to modulate the delay sound.
And believe me, the more knobs or inputs you have the less you use it, at last you are only doing the things
the MF 104 has.
For me a warm and clean sound with the usual parameters is more important than thousands of possible patches.
One of my preferred patches with the analog delay ist to modulate the time parameter by a lfo very subtile, so you get
a pitch control on the delay sound like in the beginning of Tangerine Dream's Rubycon Part II (the mellotron choir).
All the best
Axel

Am 01.06.02 08:30:04, schrieb "p. hendricks" < ph@... >:

>On 5/31/02 11:19 PM, " phaedra@... " < phaedra@... > wrote:
>
>> I don't think that an analog delay with relative short delay time is that what
>> tthe most of us want.
>> I'm using the analog delay from BigBriar, newly known as moog music, and it
>> has a delay time of about 0.8 sec
>> and a very good sound. It has the quality and the sound I want to have, but
>> the price was a nightmare.
>> To reach this quality, Mr. Doepfer has to search for very high-priced parts to
>> build in, because neither the blacet nor the AS
>
>but the MoogerFooger doesn't come close to the Blacet in terms of of CV
>control. And sadly, none of the the others... it's the CV control that makes
>modular analog delays so great, just like all other "modular" modules, and
>that's why it would be great to have a digital delay that's modular! with CV
>for all sorts of things. The TC, Line 6... and all I've seen fall way short
>of offering this.
>best,
>phil
>
>
>
>To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> doepfer_a100-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
>
>
>Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>