I don't think that an analog delay with relative short delay time is that what tthe most of us want.
I'm using the analog delay from BigBriar, newly known as moog music, and it has a delay time of about 0.8 sec
and a very good sound. It has the quality and the sound I want to have, but the price was a nightmare.
To reach this quality, Mr. Doepfer has to search for very high-priced parts to build in, because neither the blacet nor the AS
planned module will do the job of Bob Moogs MF-104, and less I wouldn't want.
Owning a good digital delay like the TC Electronics D-Two or the new one from Line6 with their filtering options is the solution
for the non-owners of a very good, but high-priced analog delay.
best regards
Axel

Am 01.06.02 07:48:37, schrieb "p. hendricks" < ph@... >:

>On 5/29/02 10:25 AM, "petergrenader" < petergrenader@... > wrote:
>
>> I know this is going to quiver some lips here, but why would
>> anyone need an ANALOG delay when didgital delays are so
>> abundantly more functional
>
>hmmmm.... I love analog and digital delays but the sound just isn't related
>enough at all to compare the two. Tey are two different beasts, just as old
>dig delays share nothing with modern ones.
>
>A dopefur analog delay would be welcome, but what could it offer that the
>Blacet doesn't and the scarce availability of the BBD chips seems to
>cancel out the possibility of it being more affordable.
>I'm interested, but is this really something Doepfer is considering or what
>is the point of the poll
>
>Well, Digital Delays are a very mixed bag, but I would prefer Doepfer look
>into a modular dig delay over an analog one, a modular dig delay could be
>excellent and affordable, but a focus on the sound quality and not length of
>delay would be great. A dig delay with lots of cv control could be amazing,
>and doepfer is probably the best manufacturer(right size) to pull something
>like that off.
>
>best,
>phil
>
>
>
>To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> doepfer_a100-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
>
>
>Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>