I understand your point completely, and I would like VC feedback also.But I
was mainly trying to push the people to think more before they start to
inflate and overfeaturize cheap modules that Dieter suggests.

;-)

On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 2:18 PM, Denis Gökdag < q-art@... > wrote:

> sure, i see your point in general, but adding two sockets for the
> feedback insert isn't a lot of work/space/money and definitely no
> roland-JV-erising thing ;-)
>
> especially with VC feedback being a pretty common task you can save a
> lot of patching with these two sockets. all you need to do is insert
> a VCA, eliminating a mixer in front of the delay input and a multiple
> at the module output (which, being unbuffered, isn't such a phantastic
> option in terms os sound quality, depending on what else is fed by
> this chain). in terms of signal fidelity you also benefit: one less
> amplification/mixing stage in the signal path (as there already *is* a
> mixer in the delay module that sums input and feedback).
>
> to me, "modular" means flexible, not "tedious" ;-)
>
> my 2 opamps,
> d
>
>
> On Aug 15, 2008, at 1:31 PM, achtung_999 wrote:
> >
> >> Come on.You have a modular synthesizer. Experiment!
> >> I'm getting a bit worried about the ongoing trend on this list.
> >> The trend of people wanting modules that have all the options build
> >> in.
> >> Too much build in features are beyond the scope of a modular.
> >
> > .
> >
> >
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]