Oh that depends. I don't make 'pop' music. I do electro-acoustic stuff and
improvised stuff with the A100. For me there is no one way of working.Although
the audio engineer in me prefers to put the filters before the VCAs..
Not having one specific way of working is what I consider the true luxery of
working with modular systems

On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 12:46 AM, techmaster242 < techmaster@... >wrote:

> Do you generally patch a filter in after you bring all of your stuff
> down to one signal Like after the VCA and mixer
>
>
> --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com <Doepfer_a100%40yahoogroups.com>,
> achtung_999
> <heinrich.himmelwasser@...> wrote:
> >
> > It may seem identical. But believe me they are 2 completly different
> beasts.
> > The 120 is an extremely polite moog style filter. (I own it but
> don't really
> > like it, bought it very cheap 2nd hand)The politeness is accentuated
> by the
> > fact that my 120 has a very low output level compared to the other
> Doepfer
> > filters I own. --Question to others: is that also with your A120
> filters --
> > (If you want a moog style filter I defiantely recommend the A108, again,
> > can't stress it too much)
> >
> > The 102 comes quite close to the EMS VCS3 filter. Dirt galore to the
> max!
> > To say that it is more drastic is a bit of an understatement. ;-)
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Sun, Aug 10, 2008 at 10:32 PM, techmaster242 <techmaster@...>wrote:
> >
> > > From what I can tell, the 102 is basically identical to the 120 in
> > > functionality, obviously the main difference is 102 is diode, and 120
> > > is moog style. What's the difference sonically Is the 102 harsher
> > > sounding It does more drastic things to the sound than the moog
> style
> > >
> > > --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com <Doepfer_a100%40yahoogroups.com><Doepfer_a100%
> 40yahoogroups.com>,
>
> > > achtung_999
> > >
> > > <heinrich.himmelwasser@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > My first filter was the A108, which is basically the deluxe version
> > > of the
> > > > A120, not the cheapest one but a beatiful filter.My favourite filter
> > > however
> > > > is the A102, got 2 of those.
> > > > And I really love the Wasp filter.
> > > >
> > > > I have more but these are my top selection.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Aug 8, 2008 at 2:20 PM, zoog_angelspit
> > > > <zoog_angelspit@>wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > I also love industrial music...here's my thoughts:
> > > > >
> > > > > I own the AS-500E (EMS Synthi Clone) that you mentioned. it is
> > > > > AWESOME!!! it's a diode filter.
> > > > >
> > > > > Doepfer also do a Doide filter called A-102...and i think it's
> their
> > > > > BEST filter...really unique and awesome sound - LOVE IT!
> > > > > it can be warm and juicy or cold and harsh....it's got the wildest
> > > > > RES on it! ...and it's one of thier cheapest filters.
> > > > >
> > > > > A-120 is not my favourite...it's a little plain.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > For example, you can get a low pass filter, high pass filter
> > > > > > or band pass filter. Is there a Doepfer module that maybe has
> > > > > > all 3 combined where it's
> > > > >
> > > > > A-124 WASP filter is a 3 in one...and it's also brilliant.
> very harsh
> > > > > and distinctive sound.
> > > > >
> > > > > > Also, I've heard mention of "sub-oscillators" somewhere.
> > > > >
> > > > > the A-115 is kind-of a sub oscillator...it gives you several "sub
> > > > > octives" to fatten the sound up. it's inexpensive and very useful.
> > > > >
> > > > > we have a few YouTube thingies that use heaps of Doepfer stuff:
> > > > > http://www.angelspit.net/blipvert/
> > > > >
> > > > > Doepfer stuff is BRILLIANT for modulating and doing "tricky
> stuff"...!
> > > > >
> > > > > ROCK!
> > > > >
> > > > > ZooG.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
>
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]