So it boils down to what I say. Modular digital/analog granular synthesis is
expensive! :-)

A work around to this would be to get a multi-out sound card (say 8 outs),
send a grain to each output (easily done with PD, Max, LiSa, etc.) and
connect those outputs to modules... This way, only the source audio would be
digital (as it would be with a DSP module) and the processing would be
analog.

I do have such an audio interface but don't have enough modules to try it
out. Perhaps someone here who owns those monster cases full of modules
could

Denis, are you Turkish by any chance Your last name is Turkish, it seems.

Best,

Korhan

On 3/5/08, David Salter < david.salter@... > wrote:
>
> hi Denis,
>
> I love granular systems and you have described a very desirable module. I
> agree that you need as much control as possible and that would indeed make
> such a module expensive and large as I would prefer 16 grains but would
> settle on 8.
>
> If only :o)
>
> David
>
> David Salter
> Senior Consultant
> PSG
>
> Reuters Messaging: david.salter.reuters.com@... <david.salter.reuters.com%40reuters.net>
> (t) +44 (0)20 7542 2402 | (m) 07990562402 | (f) 52699
>
> Get the latest news at Reuters.com < http://reuters.com/ > <
> http://www.reuters.com/ >
>
> ________________________________
>
> From: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com <Doepfer_a100%40yahoogroups.com>[mailto:
> Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com <Doepfer_a100%40yahoogroups.com>] On Behalf
> Of Denis Gökdag
> Sent: 05 March 2008 13:33
> To: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com <Doepfer_a100%40yahoogroups.com>
> Subject: Re: 1 Re: granular processor & generato
>
> Weeeelllll.....
>
> there is no reason a DSP-based granular module should not be able to
> output n grains to n outputs. Grains are computed as separate
> entities and get summed just before the output. So skipping the
> summing stage and replacing it with n outputs would not be such an
> issue. It would raise the price of a module because you'd use more D/
> A's, though. So filter, amp and panning could all be done outside
> such a module, provided the module outputs trigger data etc for each
> grain.
>
> What would really make the whole thing rely on a high-powered DSP (or
> more than one) is if you want to be able to modulate transposition/
> position etc at audio rate....IMHO a must in a modular (can you spell
> "control rate vs audio rate" in reaktor ugh)
>
> I personally think that an 8 or 16 grain system would be sufficient,
> provided there was a way to link more than one in an "intelligent"
> manner.
>
> Now what i think is the main issue with a module like this is: what
> control philosophy does it use You can either have dedicated control
> of every grain or use some sort of "structural logic" that the module
> itself applies (aka "grain density" instead of separate grain
> triggers, "pitch jitter" instead of CV control of every grain pitch,
> "density evolution" instead of variable rate grain trigger signal). I
> personally think that in a modular system you'd want the discrete
> version, if i want meta-control only i can use reaktor or anything
> else.....the cool thing is to have the grain stuff *integrate*
> perfectly into the system, and for that you definitely need access to
> the individual grain's parameters. Now the downside of this is that
> it would be a large and expensive module, and that doing some of the
> standard meta-attribute stuff would take a lot of patching. Maybe
> here there would be a good opportunity to create some structured data
> modules.....;-)
>
> Now imagine what you could do with a grain thang at audio rate....use
> an audio rate pulse for the triggering of a grain, clock a sequencer
> with the same pulse and have that select playback position and grain
> transposition (or grain duration) of the grain thang, effectively
> getting a waveform that is F*N in length ( F being pulse frequency
> expressed in seconds, N being number of steps in the sequence). And
> we're just talking about grain #1 here :-)
>
> my 2 ct
>
> d
>
> On 05. Mar 2008, at 9:12 AM, Korhan Erel wrote:
>
> > Hi Carlos,
> >
> > As I said in my earlier mail that even a 4-grain system would cost a
> > fortune. On the other hand, a module that includes a DSP programmed
> > to do
> > granular synthesis would also cost a lot, given that it will have
> > to be a
> > powerful DSP to handle a high number of grains. It would also have to
> > include features like slew, filter, pitch shifting, amp, panning,
> > etc, as
> > you would not be able to process grains separately with modules.
> >
> > Korhan
> >
> > On 3/5/08, Carlos < bushwick@... <bushwick%40gmail.com> <mailto:
> bushwick%40gmail.com> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Granular synthesis uses anywhere from a few dozen grains to
> > thousands of
> > > them.being able to change the number of grains is essential to
> > get a good
> > > variety of sounds, I don't think a few fixed grains would do the
> > trick
> > >
> > > --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com <Doepfer_a100%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:
> Doepfer_a100%40yahoogroups.com> <Doepfer_a100%
> > 40yahoogroups.com>,
> > > "Korhan Erel" <listekutusu@...> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Since the A-112s cannot toggle between record and play, my idea
> > of the
> > > > granular synthesis can work only on prerecorded samples
> > (assuming it was
> > > a
> > > > good/feasible idea to start with)
> > > >
> > > > On 3/3/08, Korhan Erel <listekutusu@...> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Can several A-112s be used to construct a simple granular
> > synth, with
> > > the
> > > > > A-112s in wavetable mode Each A-112 would represent a grain
> > going
> > > into a
> > > > > filter and then into a VCA, shaped by a ADSR I guess a 4
> > grain synth
> > > would
> > > > > cost a small fortune, but it's probably worth it.
> > > > >
> > > > > On 2/17/08, gasp_uleg <uleg2@...> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > i am a fanatic of modular concept but i never had the money
> > to build
> > > > > > the gigantic modular of my dreams so i went into virtual and i
> > > > > > specialized myself into Reaktor, where i've found
> > everythink i ever
> > > > > > needed.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > but the thing is that i deeply hate to use computer in
> > concerts so
> > > > > > now i'm trying to rebuild my reaktor setups into a totally
> > physical
> > > > > > way. with A100 and the other modulars everything i need can
> > > perfectly
> > > > > > be done EXCEPT granulation which has become my favourite sound
> > > > > > generator and modifier latelly.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > i think not only granular cloud-delay processing is
> > interesting.
> > > also
> > > > > > a granular sample player would be an amazing module.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > i don't know much about DSP but if people like clavia have
> > been able
> > > > > > to fit all what is inside a micromodular or if pedal
> > manufacturers
> > > > > > are now using DSP for their new guitar pedals, it must be
> > possible
> > > to
> > > > > > find some cheap DSP technology to be fit into a vc modular
> > format.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > of course i understand development and technical expertise
> > is very
> > > > > > diferent for digital stuff than
> > > > > > for purelly analog electronics design but i'm sure ther are
> > many
> > > > > > young geniuses running out there with their nice diplomas
> > in "very
> > > > > > really complicated informatics" just willing to be emploid to
> > > program
> > > > > > the complicated DSP algorithms for our modulars.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> >
> >
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
> This email was sent to you by Reuters, the global news and information
> company.
> To find out more about Reuters visit www.about.reuters.com
>
> Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender,
> except where the sender specifically states them to be the views of
> Reuters Limited.
>
> Reuters Limited is part of the Reuters Group of companies, of which
> Reuters Group PLC is the ultimate parent company.
> Reuters Group PLC - Registered office address: The Reuters Building, South
> Colonnade, Canary Wharf, London E14 5EP, United Kingdom
> Registered No: 3296375
> Registered in England and Wales
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]