Thanks man. Let me know when you put them up.

The A-112's record/play mode cannot be toggled by CV, right If this was
possible, I would get several of these units probably. Is there any
modification to achieve this

On 3/3/08, Florian Anwander < Florian.Anwander@... > wrote:
>
> Hello Korhan
>
> > Florian, can you please elaborate on the use of A160,161 or the A151. I
> am
> > totally unfamiliar with these modules and cannot imagine how I could use
> > them in my setup. An example that contains some of the modules mentioned
> > here would be very useful.
> Have alook at http://www.doepfer.de/a100_man/A161_man.pdf
> Page 8 contains an example for the usage of A161 with A131 as a sequencer.
>
> The A-151 would work similar, but to achieve the same effect you have to
> feed a constant voltage into the common i/o of the module. You will get
> more variations if this is not a constant voltage but a LFO or some
> quasi random stuff (like LFOs in the audio range or VCOs).
>
> > What would happen if an instrument, a clarinet or tenor sax, is fed
> directly
> > into a PLL You can assume that the instrumentalists are virtuosos and
> can
> > play whatever is required. I am looking for radical changes -
> > I would prefer terrible pitch tracking to very good pitch tracking.
> Then the A-196 is the right choice: terrible pitch tracking at its best.
>
> > the frequency and hence want the A-110. Envelope out from A-119 would be
> a
> > nice modulation source for the A-110, I guess.
> That is right. Especially if you use the VCO-out as modulation source
> for a high resonating VCF (can create some "talking" sounds).
>
> > The S&H is the A-148.Slew limiters are 170 and 171. 170 has two, 171 has
> CV
> > control. Which one should I get I'm usually a numbers guy and assume 2
> is
> > better than 1.
> ok, AS does not have a S&H + Slewlimiter as combimodule. But others that
> are interesting:
> http://www.analoguesystems.co.uk/modules/rs40.htm
> http://www.analoguesystems.co.uk/modules/rs380.htm
>
> The A171 slewlimiter is definitely recommended over the A170, because of
> its usability in connection with the PLL A-196 (too complicated to
> explain now).
>
> Florian
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]