Dear Mr Doepfer,

What about normalled cv inputs and polarizers instead of attenuators

The "4 HP expansion module with 8 sockets" is also attractive.

I'm not interested in a manual phase shift control because I would
like to control the A1372 with an A1431.

Finally, I would like to say that I love affordable 8HP Doepfer
modules. They leave space and money for your other great modules (A103
, A107, A1112, A143x, A155 ... too numerous to mention).

Best,

Pierre,

--- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com , "matijnboshoven"
<matijnboshoven@...> wrote:

>
> --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com , <hardware@> wrote:
> >
> > Dear members,
> >
> > thank you for the poll results. For the A-189-1 that's what I
> expected. For
> > the A-137-2 I'm a bit surpised that only 8% vote for a manual phase
> shift
> > control. From my point of view this is a very important function.
> Without
> > this additional controls only symmetrical signals (like LFOs) can be
> used
> > meaningful to control the phase shift. With an ADSR or another

unipolar

> > (only positive) CV only 50% of the phase shift can be covered. Maybe
> I will
> > override the poll results in this regard. Sorry :-(
> >
> > Even for the A-189-1 we think about a solution that would cover the
> other
> > options too. E.g. one of the 16 positions of the rotary switch will
> address
> > the voltage controlled mode selection and we will add a terminal on
> the pc
> > board that can be used to connect an external CV (e.g. the output of
> a mixer
> > or polarizing mixer).
> >
> > Thank you
> > Dieter Doepfer
> >
> Please override the poll on the A-137-2, I (and I presume more people)
> didn't understand it.
>